ERDEM-NEWSLETTER-2018-metin

279 LAW OF CIVIL PROCEDURE of promptness expected, from the amendment. Although a new procedural code has entered into force, there is no obli- gation to change the existing DUJ when it is considered that the decisions of the Constitutional Court holding that the ban on amendment after reversal of a verdict was not a violation of rights, and the legislator’s did not abolish or amend the DUJ, even though this was known to the legislator. Conclusion Due to abovementioned opinions, the Court of Cassation General Assembly on Unification of Judgments has ruled that an amendment cannot be filed after reversal of a verdict, and that the current DUJ should not be changed.