The Code on Movable Pledges and Its Innovations

November 2016 Alper Uzun
% 0

The Code on Pledges of Movables in Commercial Transactions No. 6750 (“Code”) published in the Official Gazette dated October 28th, 2016 and numbered 29871 will enter into force on January 1st, 2017. The preamble of the Code states that along with globalization, the role of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (“SMEs”) in the world economy rises each day, that SMEs are significant elements of the economic and social development, that the Code is prepared in order to ease the access of SMEs to financial sources, in order to improve their competitive power with large enterprises, and to contribute to the development of the world economy.

The Code regulates the alternative elements that could be used as a guarantee by the enterprises, while easing access to financial sources. The future assets that are planned to be obtained by the enterprises, in addition to the acquisitions of movables, are included as assets that may be pledged. It is aimed to provide publicity, and to track the pledge of movables within “the Moveable Pledge Registry.” Also, a more efficient mechanism is provided in the foreclosure of the pledge.

The Law on Commercial Enterprise Pledge No. 1447 will be revoked by the entry into force of the Code.

The Purpose and the Scope

The Code aims to facilitate and increase the use of pledges on movable assets as collateral, to widen the scope of movables that are subject to the pledge, to provide publicity, and to ease the access to financial sources by offering alternative foreclosure means.

The Code will be applied on the pledged transactions that are formed in order to constitute collaterals on debt, as well as on moveable assets that are secured under the Code. However, it will not be applied on pledge agreements in the capital markets and derivative financial instruments, in addition to the pledges on bank deposits. Similarly, movable assets that are registered with the Land Registry are not covered by the Code.

The Code defines the right of a pledge as follows: “A limited real right independent from the type of the moveable pledge, the situation of the pledger or the pledgee, the quality of the debt that was guaranteed by the pledge or naming of it as a pledge right by the parties; in order to guarantee redemption or fulfillment of a debt, including the right to claim of the transferee during the transfer of the claim without a transfer of possession.”

The Code states that the pledge agreement shall be registered and either executed by the signatories in front of a notary public, or in a notarial form, or electronically via registered electronic signatures of the signatories. Also, the Code enables the pledge agreements to be concluded among credit institutions and merchants, craftsmen, farmers, producer organizations, natural and legal persons who are freelancers, and between merchants and/or craftsmen.

The movables that are registered with the Land Registry, financial agreements on capital market instruments and derivatives, and pledges on bank deposits are not covered by the Code.

The Regulations and Amendments Introduced by the Code

The major renovation introduced by the Code is, to enable the establishment of pledges on movables without delivery, and establishment of it as a total pledge of a commercial enterprise. In other words, the Code enables the establishment of pledges on movables that are registered to the Movables Registry, without their delivery.

As of the entry into force of the Code, to provide publicity and pursuance on movable pledges, and for its application on third parties, the Registry on Pledges of Movables (“Registry”) for pledged movables will be established by the Ministry of Customs and Trade, and all transactions to be made with the Registry will be on-line. Thereby, the Registry will enable third parties to be informed on the situation of the pledges of an enterprise or a merchant. The provisions on moveable pledges that are obliged to be registered to other registries are undisclosed. It is ruled that within scope of the Code, these moveable assets cannot be pledged through registration with the Registry.

Article 4 of the Code regulates the manner in which to execute the right of pledges. Accordingly, the right of a pledge is executed by registration of the pledge agreement with the Registry. The Code clearly states that the pledge right will be enured to the third parties upon the registration with the Registry.

As it is listed in the Code, the pledge right can be established on assets, trees that provide perennial yield, intellectual property rights, feedstock, animals, any kind of acquisition and revenues, rental incomes, tenancy rights, consumable materials, stocks, agricultural products, tradenames or business names, commercial transactions or craftsman transactions, commercial plates and commercial lines, commercial projects, movable enterprise plants, such as carriages, machines and rigs, vehicles, equipment, work tools, and etc., and any licenses and warranties which are not registered to any other registry and cannot be assumed as administrative permit. The Code enables enterprises to establish pledges on various assets, including present and future assets. Moreover, within the scope of the Code, it is possible to establish a second pledge on a pledged asset. Therefore, the Code introduces a ranking system between the pledges. The guarantee established by the pledge shall be limited to the stated amount and its rank in the registry. If a rank is defined on an asset, the rank order shall be respected. If plural pledges are established without any rank order, the priority will be given to pre-established pledges.

The Code enables the parties of the pledge agreement, to have the movable be valued prior to the pledge proceeding. This regulation states that the required qualifications of real and legal persons to service on valuation will be determined with a directive to be prepared by the Ministry of Customs and Trade.

The Rights and Liabilities of the Parties

The Code introduces various rights and liabilities of the parties of the pledge agreement. Accordingly, the possessor of the moveable asset is liable to take necessary precautions to protect the value of the movable. If the possessor acts in a way so as to reduce the value of the product, the pledgee can apply to the Court and request prohibition of such actions. The pledgee is enabled to examine the moveable subject to the pledge. The pledger is obliged to compensate the loss of pledgee if the value of the moveable is reduced. Other rights and liabilities not contrary to the Code can be determined in the agreement.

In the event of non-performance of the payment of the debt secured under the Code, three alternatives of foreclosure of the pledge are possible (i) transfer of the movable’s ownership to the first degree pledgees by applying to the Execution Office, (ii) transfer of the receivables to an asset management company; and (iii) exercise of the right to lease or license the properties that cannot be subject to a transfer of possession. If the debt cannot be collected by the stated methods, an execution proceeding under general rules can be exercised.

The Code provides sanctions to be applied on parties in some cases. For example, the pledgee shall apply for de-registration of the pledge from the registry within three (3) business days upon the payment of the receivable. If the pledgee fails to do that, an administrative fine of 1/10 of the receivable shall be paid to the creditor.

Additionally, if the pledger or the transferee of the movable pledge do not use the moveable pledge in line with the Code, do not transfer the ownership of the pledge even though they do not pay the debt, ruin or demolish the pledged moveable with the purpose of hurting the pledgee, do not register the transfer of the moveable to the Registry, or attempt to deceive the Registry, an administrative fine of up to one-half of the debt upon the complaint of pledgee will be levied on the pledger or transferee.

Conclusion

The Code is regulated with the intention to provide the establishment of a pledge on the assets of SMEs, and to contribute to these enterprises’ financial needs. It aims to extend the usage of the right on the pledge of movables, and to provide an environment of trust for that. For the Registry to be established following to the entry into force of the Code, it is expected to provide publicity for the pledges of moveable assets and enure on third parties. The Code will enter into force on January 1st, 2017, but will not take effect on ongoing litigation and execution proceedings.

All rights of this article are reserved. This article may not be used, reproduced, copied, published, distributed, or otherwise disseminated without quotation or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm's written consent. Any content created without citing the resource or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm’s written consent is regularly tracked, and legal action will be taken in case of violation.

Other Contents

Prohibition of Payment in Foreign Currency in Lease Agreements
Newsletter Articles
Prohibition of Payment in Foreign Currency in Lease Agreements

The Decree No. 32 on the Protection of the Value of Turkish Currency (“Decree No. 32”) and the Communiqué No. 2008-32/34 on the Decree No. 32 on the Protection of the Value of Turkish Currency (“Communiqué”) prohibit the determination of the contract prices of certain contracts and other payment obligations...

Law of Obligations 31.03.2023
Decision of the Court of Cassation General Assembly of Civil Chambers on Proof of Excess Damage
Newsletter Articles
Decision of the Court of Cassation General Assembly of Civil Chambers on Proof of Excess Damage

The issue of proving damages in cases related to the excess damages is frequently subject to the examination and evaluation of both the Supreme Court and different chambers of the Court of Cassation. With its decision dated 29.03.2022 and numbered 2021/928 E. 2022/401 K., the Court of Cassation General...

Law of Obligations 31.01.2023
Constitutional Court Decision on the Time Limit for Requesting an Appeal and the Right of Access to the Court
Newsletter Articles
Constitutional Court Decision on the Time Limit for Requesting an Appeal and the Right of Access to the Court

The Constitutional Court's decision dated 14.09.2022 and published in the Official Gazette dated 25.10.2022 and numbered 31994 ("the Constitutional Court Decision") examines whether the start of the application period related to the applicant’s request for appeal being from the date of the pronouncement of...

Law of Obligations 30.11.2022
Invalidity of Exemption Agreements
Newsletter Articles
Invalidity of Exemption Agreements

Although the general principle in the law of contracts is freedom of contract or, in other words, freedom of will, the parties’ wills are not completely free in the case of exemption agreements. The validity of these agreements is limited by the mandatory provisions of the Turkish Code of Obligations...

Law of Obligations 30.09.2022
The Constitutional Court’s Decision on Cahide Demir’s Application with regards to the Right to Property
Newsletter Articles
The Constitutional Court’s Decision on Cahide Demir’s Application with regards to the Right to Property

The Constitutional Court, in its decision dated 14.09.2021 on application no. 2018/25663 (“Decision"), found that applicant Cahide Demir’s right to property was violated on the ground that the mortgage on her real estate, established to secure a third party’s debt, had not been released by the...

Law of Obligations May 2022
Non-Liability Agreements According To The Provisions Of Code Of Obligations
Newsletter Articles
The Sanction of a Contract Provision Being Deemed Unwritten in the Context of General Terms and Conditions
Newsletter Articles
The Sanction of a Contract Provision Being Deemed Unwritten in the Context of General Terms and Conditions

The use of general terms and conditions is a commercial reality not only in consumer transactions but also in commercial transactions in certain industries such as automotive, banking, insurance, telecommunications and energy...

Law of Obligations January 2022
Bitcoin under Turkish Law
Newsletter Articles
Bitcoin under Turkish Law
Law of Obligations November 2020
EFET General Agreement Concerning the Delivery and Acceptance of Electricity
Newsletter Articles
A New Player in Liability Law: Artificial Intelligence
Newsletter Articles
The Practice of Unforeseen Circumstance in EPC Contracts
Newsletter Articles
Adaptation of Lease Agreements within the Scope of New Coronavirus (COVID-19)
Newsletter Articles
A New Era in Lease Agreements
Newsletter Articles
A New Era in Lease Agreements
Law of Obligations June 2020
Parallel Debt and its Legal Nature under Turkish Law
Newsletter Articles
Intragroup Loans
Newsletter Articles
Intragroup Loans
Law of Obligations December 2018
Adapting Bilateral Agreements based on Natural Gas in the Electricity Market
Newsletter Articles
Seller’s Liability Due to Defects in Purchase Agreements
Newsletter Articles
Handover of the Leased Property after Conclusion of the Lease Agreement
Newsletter Articles
Bank Letters of Credit
Newsletter Articles
Bank Letters of Credit
Law of Obligations September 2017
Electronic Contracting in Turkey
Newsletter Articles
Electronic Contracting in Turkey
Law of Obligations July 2017
Movable Pledge Agreements in Commercial Transactions
Newsletter Articles
Special Lien in Favour of the Lessor
Newsletter Articles
Special Lien in Favour of the Lessor
Law of Obligations April 2017
Can Errors in Predicting Future Facts Be Considered Fundamental Errors?
Newsletter Articles
Contractual Penalty under Turkish Law
Newsletter Articles
Contractual Penalty under Turkish Law
Law of Obligations September 2016

For creative legal solutions, please contact us.