E-Marketplace Platforms Industry Review Preliminary Report Part 2: “Shahmaran’s Story”

February 2022 Mert Karamustafaoğlu

You can read the first part of "E-Marketplace Platforms Industry Review Preliminary Report Series" here.

% 0

Introduction

Shahmaran, a Mesopotamian myth, is believed to take place in Tarsus. According to the myth, the shah of snakes is the immortal and omniscient "Shahmaran." Shahmaran is described as a beautiful woman living in her cave with her snakes. She lived seven floors below the ground, she had a body of a snake and a human head. A woodcutter was the first to encounter the Shahmaran, the queen of snakes, who lived with her omniscient snakes called Meran. One day, a woodcutter named Camasb, after he got betrayed by his friends, was trapped in a cave he entered to collect honey. After crawling through a hole he saw in the cave, he discovered a beautiful garden. This garden and the cave are where Shahmaran lived.

Shahmaran liked this young woodcutter and let him live with her. Shahmaran, perhaps out of loneliness, fell in love with him. The snakes warned Shahmaran that people are ungrateful, and he would betray her confidence, but Shahmaran did not listen to the snakes. She taught him the secrets she knew, including how to make medicine. However, Camasb missed the family he left behind. Shahmaran allowed the woodcutter to return to his family, as long as he did not tell anyone her whereabouts. However, foreseeing what will happen, Shahmaran told the young woodcutter that one day he would give her away, and that this would be the death of her. Camasb kept his word and did not tell anyone the whereabouts of the cave for years. However, one day the sultan fell ill. The vizier claimed that the cure for this disease was the meat of Shahmaran. Shahmaran's cave was sought all over the country. When the vizier learned that Camasb knew the whereabouts of the cave, he had Camasb tortured for the knowledge. Eventually, Shahmaran was caught in her cave. Before she died, Shahmaran told Camasb: "Boil my head and let the sultan drink it to be saved, let the vizier drink my body, so that he dies, boil my tail and drink it, so that you become a Luqman." Camasb did what he was told; the evil vizier died and the Sultan was saved. Camasb, who knew more about medicine than anyone, became immortal and came to be known as Luqman, only to live with his guilt forever.

The Shahmaran legend contains important elements of humanity in many aspects. Perhaps its most important message is that knowledge does not always bring good to its holder. Similarly, many findings of the Competition Authority’s E-market Place Platforms Industry Review and its Preliminary Report reveal that the commercial data obtained by the aforementioned platforms raise competitive concerns to a large extent. So, at the end of this review, many things will radically change for these undertakings and we will see brand new approaches, especially regarding data-driven competitive concerns.

This article will further examine the competitive concerns raised in my previous article on this subject.

1. Fundamental Findings of Competition Issues

The main purpose of the report is to examine the competitive concerns that arise in practice and cannot be addressed with basic competition law instruments. In particular, due to the structural characteristics of the market, the market power of incumbent undertakings enables them to easily monopolize.

The aforementioned section of the Report begins by stating a fundamental difficulty. Specifically, there are concerns arising from platforms that are difficult to address with traditional competition law instruments. Traditional instruments are not suitable for the operation of the platforms, and the characteristics of the relevant market provide monopoly power to incumbent undertakings. In this context, the Report examined competitive concerns under three headings.

Fundamental Concerns for Cross Platform Competition

Competition among e-marketplaces is especially critical to attain the expected benefits from the platforms. However, due to the network effects in the market, incumbent undertakings that are gatekeepers can easily push their competitors out of the market with anti-competitive behaviors. Among the important findings in the Report is that the Most Favored Customer Clauses (“MFC”), which are widely used in the aforementioned market, exclusivity conditions, and the prevention of data portability, are the main practices that can target cross-platform competition. Notably, MFC clauses enforced by the gatekeepers will reduce competition based on the commission rate and may cause price rigidity over time. The report also finds that there is no efficiency gain to justify the broad MFC clause implementation by gatekeepers.

Another finding is related to the vendor and consumer data of the aforementioned gatekeepers. The Report also emphasizes that there should be no technical or behavioral barriers for the transfer of this data, which provides significant market power, to other platforms.

Fundamental Concerns for Intra-Platform Competition

The report emphasizes the bargaining power of e-marketplace platforms vis-à-vis vendors, and as a result, it determines that the commercial terms are determined unilaterally by the platforms. Thus, the Report states that it is important to establish a business environment that will operate in line with the principles of "objectivity," "transparency," "clarity" and "predictability."

E-marketplaces also operate as vendors on their own platforms. For this reason, the aforementioned undertakings are also in the position of competitors with the vendors using the platform. This situation, especially for gatekeeper marketplaces, raises competitive concerns expressed as “favoritism towards itself”.

In the report, examples of favoritism by e-marketplaces mentioned in the report include the following: "giving priority to their own product in listings and rankings,", "obtaining an unfair advantage in sales, by using the vendors’ data" and "providing unfair advantages to vendors using its related services over other vendors." In order to eliminate the information asymmetry in favor of the marketplaces, the report suggests that the "listing, ranking, and related service usage" conditions should be determined "objectively" and shared with the vendors in a "clear," "understandable" language, in a "transparent" and "easily accessible" way.

The report states that the gatekeeper marketplace(s) must not create technical or behavioral barriers to access and transfer of their data to other platforms, so as not to restrict multiple access opportunities for consumers and vendors.

Fundamental Concerns for Consumers

The main concern for consumers in the Report is in regard to the fallacy of free service. Consumers, just like in other platform economies, actually pay with their data for services they think are free. For this reason, consumers do not show sensitivity in terms of services they pay with data compared to paid services. Thus, exploits such as excessive data collection by platforms and violation of consumers' privacy become possible.

The report also determines that consumers are harmed by information asymmetry at the point at which data is collected, how it is used, and how it is presented by the marketplaces, and that this makes consumers vulnerable to manipulation and exploitation. In order to prevent this, the report states that e-marketplaces’ adoption of "clear," "transparent," "easily accessible" and "adaptable to preferences" policies based on "objective" criteria in areas open to manipulation and exploitation such as listing, ranking and product comments would be beneficial.

2. Policy Recommendations

The report offers three policy recommendations as a solution. These are as follows:

  • Strengthening Secondary Competition Law Legislation
  • Platform Code of Conduct Regulation
  • Gatekeeper Regulation

In this context, the report states under the heading of strengthening secondary legislation that clearer provisions should be included in the secondary legislation, especially on MFC practices. In addition, it also states that new regulations should be adopted in the secondary legislation regarding exploitative practices and especially excessive data collection of platforms.

Another area of policy change is the aim of publishing brand-new guidelines on the Platform Code of Conduct. Published guidelines are proposed on the basis of “objectivity,” “transparency,” “clarity” and “predictability” to serve as a reference in bilateral relations on the grounds that commercial terms may be determined unilaterally and unfairly due to the asymmetric market power of the platforms.

Finally, a legislative proposal is made on the Gatekeeper Regulation. The aforementioned legal regulation aims to determine the undertakings that have the characteristics of Gatekeepers, and the behaviors that Gatekeepers are obliged to avoid. In this regard, some of the proposed obligations are noteworthy.

Particularly noteworthy are radical suggestions such as prohibiting these undertakings from imposing MFC clauses on vendors, non-use of non-public data obtained from the activities of the vendors in platforms’ own products in competition with the products of these vendors. Similarly, the Report's recommendations include forbidding undertakings or companies belonging to their group from granting advantages to their own products in the rankings on their own platforms, or creating technical or behavioral obstacles to the transfer of the data provided by their vendors, or consumers, to other platforms. The most important suggestion made in this context is the notification of all acquisitions made by the undertakings that have the characteristics of gatekeeper to the Competition Board, regardless of the notification thresholds included in Communiqué No. 2010/4 on Mergers and Acquisitions Calling for the Authorization of the Competition Board.

The last recommendation of the report was quickly put into practice by the Competition Authority. With the recent amendment[1] made in the Communiqué regarding the proposal on this subject, the definition of "Technology undertakings" was introduced and the turnover thresholds to be applied for undertakings operating in some markets, including digital platforms, were differentiated. In this way, the turnover thresholds for the acquisition of digital platforms operating or having R&D activities or providing services to users in Turkey were lowered. Therefore, this amendment aims to closely monitor the transactions regarding the acquisition of the previously-mentioned platforms.

References
  • Communiqué Amending Communiqué Concerning the Mergers and Acquisitions Calling for the Authorization of the Competition Board published in the Official Gazette dated 04.03.2022 and numbered 31768

All rights of this article are reserved. This article may not be used, reproduced, copied, published, distributed, or otherwise disseminated without quotation or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm's written consent. Any content created without citing the resource or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm’s written consent is regularly tracked, and legal action will be taken in case of violation.

Other Contents

A Recent CAS Decision in the Scope of European Union Competition Law: FIFA vs. Agents
Newsletter Articles
A Recent CAS Decision in the Scope of European Union Competition Law: FIFA vs. Agents

At the meeting of the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (“FIFA”) held on 16 December 2022, the FIFA Council approved the FIFA Football Agents Regulations (“FFAR”). In the FFAR, various amendments have been made, such as the introduction of a maximum service fee limit that football agents are...

Competition Law 30.09.2023
CJEU Judgment in Super Bock: New Insight on Resale Price Maintenance
Newsletter Articles
CJEU Judgment in Super Bock: New Insight on Resale Price Maintenance

Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) is still considered a hardcore restriction under the recently revised Vertical Block Exemption Regulation (VBER), which means that it cannot benefit from a statutory exemption under Article 101(1) TFEU, unlike certain other types of vertical agreements. However, it has been debated...

Competition Law 31.07.2023
The Relationship Between Economic Entity and Family Ties in Light of Competition Board Decisions
Newsletter Articles
The Relationship Between Economic Entity and Family Ties in Light of Competition Board Decisions

In competition law, it is important to accurately determine the concept of undertaking, especially in terms of mergers and acquisitions. Therefore, the concept of economic entity aims to reveal the economic units covered by the undertakings. The relationship between the concept of economic entity and family ties comes...

Competition Law 31.07.2023
A New Breath of Fresh Air for Competition Investigations from the Constitutional Court
Newsletter Articles
A New Breath of Fresh Air for Competition Investigations from the Constitutional Court

In these days when the Competition Board (“Board”) frequently imposes administrative fines for preventing on-site inspections and both the Competition Authority (“Authority”) and undertakings take legal and technical measures regarding on-site inspections, a striking development has occurred. In its decision...

Competition Law 30.06.2023
Competition Law Practices in the Online Advertising Market
Newsletter Articles
Competition Law Practices in the Online Advertising Market

Online advertising has become an important source for businesses for promoting products and services and meeting consumers, as a result of the rapid development of information technologies and increase in the use of internet. Delivering targeted messages to consumers at the right time through the digital...

Competition Law 30.06.2023
Selective Distribution Systems
Newsletter Articles
Selective Distribution Systems

Selective distribution systems refer to a type of distribution system in which suppliers commit to selling the contracted goods or services directly or indirectly to distributors selected based on specified criteria, while the distributors commit not to sell the said goods or services to unauthorized...

Competition Law 31.05.2023
Final Sector Inquiry Report of the Competition Authority Regarding Fast-Moving Consumer Goods Retailing
Newsletter Articles
Final Sector Inquiry Report of the Competition Authority Regarding Fast-Moving Consumer Goods Retailing

Fast-moving consumer goods is undoubtedly one of the sectors that the Competition Authority has been working most intensively since the COVID 19 pandemic. Among the most important developments of this period was the Sector Inquiry initiated on Fast Moving Consumer Goods (“FMCG”) Retailing...

Competition Law 30.04.2023
Constitutional Court's Evaluation of the Competition Board's Authority to Conduct On-Site Investigations
Newsletter Articles
Constitutional Court's Evaluation of the Competition Board's Authority to Conduct On-Site Investigations

In the decision of the Constitutional Court ("Constitutional Court" or "Court") dated 09.11.2022, numbered 2020/67 E. 2022/139 K. (the "Decision"), the annulment of certain articles of the Law Amending the Law on the Protection of Competition No. 4054 ("Law No. 7246") was requested...

Competition Law 30.04.2023
Gun Jumping in Turkish Competition Law
Newsletter Articles
Gun Jumping in Turkish Competition Law

In Turkish competition law, certain types of mergers and acquisitions are subject to Turkish Competition Board’s (“Board”) approval in order to gain legal validity. Pursuant to Article 7 of the Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”), the Board is competent to define mergers and acquisitions...

Competition Law 31.03.2023
The Problem of Returning the Data Obtained as a Result of Unlawful Notification in Light of the Competition Board Decision
Newsletter Articles
The Problem of Returning the Data Obtained as a Result of Unlawful Notification in Light of the Competition Board Decision

Recently, the Competition Board (the Board) had imposed administrative fines on banks and financial institutions for failing to respond to the request for information within the scope of a preliminary investigation.[i] The request for information that lays the groundwork for the administrative fine imposed by...

Competition Law 28.02.2023
The European Commission Accepts Amazon’s Commitments
Newsletter Articles
The European Commission Accepts Amazon’s Commitments

Amazon, a world-famous company, is an e-commerce company that operates the world’s largest online shopping platform. In the backstage, Amazon is a data-driven company whose retail decisions are mostly driven by automated systems, fueled by the relevant market data. That being said, Amazon has a dual...

Competition Law 31.01.2023
Deletion of WhatsApp Correspondence During On-Site Inspections
Newsletter Articles
Deletion of WhatsApp Correspondence During On-Site Inspections

The right to make on-site inspections is one of the Competition Board’s (“Board”) most important tools for revealing whether Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”) has been violated. The effective use of this authority is quite important in terms of obtaining fruitful results from...

Competition Law 31.10.2022
Amendment on the Regulation of Electronic Commerce: “The Fire of Mount Doom”
Newsletter Articles
Amendment on the Regulation of Electronic Commerce: “The Fire of Mount Doom”

“Harese” is an interesting Arabic word. There is a thorn that camels love very much in the desert. The camel eats the thorn with great greed. So much so that, its mouth bleeds as it eats, but it doesn't stop eating. The taste of the thorn is mixed with the salty taste of its own blood. This mixed taste drives the camel...

Competition Law 30.09.2022
Turkish Competition Board Fines Digiturk
Newsletter Articles
Turkish Competition Board Fines Digiturk

Turkey’s leading pay television service provider, Krea İçerik Hizmetleri ve Prodüksiyon A.Ş. (“Digiturk”), is frequently the subject of complaints made to the Competition Authority (“Authority”). In fact, the Competition Board (“Board”) issues a new decision about Digiturk almost every year. In these decisions...

Competition Law 30.09.2022
The French Competition Authority’s Decision on Meta’s Commitments
Newsletter Articles
The French Competition Authority’s Decision on Meta’s Commitments

The French Competition Authority (Autorité de la Concurrence), within the scope of the competition law proceeding initiated upon the complaint of Criteo SA (“Criteo”), accepted the commitments proposed by Meta Platforms Inc., Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd., and Facebook France...

Competition Law 31.07.2022
A Different Approach to Monetary Fines for Hindering On-Site Inspection: The Decision of the Ankara II. Administrative Court
Newsletter Articles
A Different Approach to Monetary Fines for Hindering On-Site Inspection: The Decision of the Ankara II. Administrative Court

While the scope of Competition Board’s (“Board”) power to conduct on-site inspections has increased with the introduction of Guidelines on Examination of Digital Data during On-site Inspections (“Guidelines”), nowadays the amount of monetary fines imposed on undertakings continue to...

Competition Law 31.07.2022
Hub and Spoke Cartel in Comparative Law
Newsletter Articles
Hub and Spoke Cartel in Comparative Law

The hub and spoke cartel, which is a relatively new type of violation in terms of Turkish competition law, is defined as the indirect exchange of information between two independent undertakings which are horizontal competitors on the supplier or retailer level, through another undertaking...

Competition Law April 2022
The First Settlement Case in Turkish Competition Law
Newsletter Articles
The First Settlement Case in Turkish Competition Law

The settlement mechanism has only recently been introduced to Turkish competition law practice. It entered into force with the amendment made to the Law on the Protection of Competition (“Law”) numbered 4054 on 16.06.2020, and has been in effect for less than two years. In this relatively...

Competition Law April 2022
The E-Marketplace Platforms Sector Inquiry Final Report and What It Brings
Newsletter Articles
The E-Marketplace Platforms Sector Inquiry Final Report and What It Brings

Due to their increasing share in the economy and rapid growth rate, e-marketplace platforms have come under the increasing scrutiny of the Turkish Competition Authority (“Authority”) as well as many competition authorities around the world...

Competition Law April 2022
Amendments Introduced to the Communique Concerning the Mergers and Acquisitions Requiring Competition Board’s Approval
Newsletter Articles
Amendments Introduced to the Communique Concerning the Mergers and Acquisitions Requiring Competition Board’s Approval

Pursuant to the Amendment Communiqué Concerning the Mergers and Acquisitions Requiring the Competition Board’s Approval (“Amending Communiqué”) published in the Official Gazette dated March 4th, 2022 and numbered 31768, certain amendments have been introduced...

Competition Law March 2022
A New Glance at Online Sales: The Competition Board’s BSH Decision
Newsletter Articles
A New Glance at Online Sales: The Competition Board’s BSH Decision

The Competition Board (“Board”) has recently published a reasoned decision in which it evaluated BSH Ev Aletleri Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş.’s (“BSH”) request for negative clearance or exemption with regard to its practice of prohibiting authorized dealers from making sales through online marketplaces...

Competition Law March 2022
Online Sales Within The Framework Of Competition Law
Newsletter Articles
The Effects of the Recent Decision by the Turkish Competition Board on Market Chains and Their Suppliers
Newsletter Articles
The Effects of the Recent Decision by the Turkish Competition Board on Market Chains and Their Suppliers

During the COVID-19 pandemic, competitive concerns about the pricing behavior of chain markets, manufacturers, and wholesalers engaged in the retail trade of food and cleaning supplies led to an investigation by...

Competition Law January 2022
On-Site Inspections in Light of the Recent Decisions of the Competition Authority
Newsletter Articles
On-Site Inspections in Light of the Recent Decisions of the Competition Authority

When the past decisions and the recent decisions of the Competition Board (“Board”) are examined, a significant increase can be observed in the number of decisions where the Board found hindrance or obstruction of on-site inspections. This situation shows that...

Competition Law December 2021
The European Commission Fines Banks for Participating in a Forex Cartel
Newsletter Articles
The European Commission Fines Banks for Participating in a Forex Cartel

The European Commission began investigating the collusive behavior of Credit Suisse, UBS, Barclays, RBS, and HSBC in the Foreign Exchange (forex) spot trading market in 2019. With the recent press release dated 02.12.2021, the Commission announced that the case is now closed...

Competition Law December 2021
Hub and Spoke Cartels
Newsletter Articles
Hub and Spoke Cartels
Competition Law November 2021
E-Marketplace Platforms Industry Review Preliminary Report Part 1: “Captain, an object is approaching”
Newsletter Articles
E-Marketplace Platforms Industry Review Preliminary Report Part 1: “Captain, an object is approaching”

Digitalization, in particular, necessitates the rewriting of competition law rules. Competition law is at the center all questions regarding e-commerce and digital platforms. The aforementioned platforms, which have become prominent due to innovations in...

Competition Law November 2021
Coca Cola’s Commitments in the Recent Competition Investigation
Newsletter Articles
Settlement Regulation Enters into Force
Newsletter Articles
Settlement Regulation Enters into Force
Competition Law July 2021
Competition Law Concerns Regarding Human Resources Practices
Newsletter Articles
The New Cartel Decision of the Competition Board
Newsletter Articles
The New Cartel Decision of the Competition Board
Competition Law September 2020
Amendments in the Law on the Protection of Competition
Newsletter Articles
Setting Legal Grounds for On-site Inspections
Newsletter Articles
Evaluation of COVID 19 Outbreak in Terms of Turkish Competition Law
Newsletter Articles
The File of Sahibinden.com; A Phoenix Story
Newsletter Articles
The File of Sahibinden.com; A Phoenix Story
Competition Law February 2020
Final and Interim Decisions of the Turkish Competition Board
Newsletter Articles
Second Stage in Facebook File
Newsletter Articles
Second Stage in Facebook File
Competition Law September 2019
European Commission’s Foreign Exchange Spot Trading Cartel Decisions
Newsletter Articles
Expected Second Half of Competition Authority’s 12 Banks Decision
Newsletter Articles
Turkish Competition Board’s Sahibinden.com Decision
Newsletter Articles
Recent Developments in Abuse of Dominance Concerning Online Platforms
Newsletter Articles
New Horizons in Competition Law; Diesel Emissions Scandal
Newsletter Articles
Recent Developments in the Right of Access to Files
Newsletter Articles
Cards are being redistributed in the Turkish Beer Market
Newsletter Articles
The Recent Motor Vehicles Insurance Decision of the Competition Board
Newsletter Articles
Selective Distribution Systems under the Light of Coty Decision
Newsletter Articles
Competition Authority’s Sector Inquiry Report on Television Broadcasting
Newsletter Articles
Excessive Pricing
Newsletter Articles
Excessive Pricing
Competition Law June 2017
Amazon Decision and E-Book Commitments
Newsletter Articles
Amazon Decision and E-Book Commitments
Competition Law June 2017
Umbrella Effect within the Framework of Private Competition Enforcement
Newsletter Articles
Tüpraş Decision and the Rebate Systems
Newsletter Articles
Tüpraş Decision and the Rebate Systems
Competition Law September 2016
Important Reason in Terms Of Share Transfer Restrictions
Newsletter Articles
Booking.com Decision
Newsletter Articles
Booking.com Decision
Competition Law January 2017
Price / Margin Squeeze
Newsletter Articles
Price / Margin Squeeze
Competition Law November 2016
Recent Problems in Electricity Distribution Sector: ELDER Decision
Newsletter Articles
Intellectual Property Rights As Capital in Kind
Newsletter Articles
Right To Request Information Of The Shareholders in Joint Stock Companies
Newsletter Articles
Affected Market
Newsletter Articles
Affected Market
Competition Law August 2015

For creative legal solutions, please contact us.