Representation in Joint Stock Companies
Introduction
Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102[1] (“TCC”) preserves the rule that the board of directors shall manage and represent joint stock companies. The TCC regulates how the power of representation shall be exercised, the registration and announcement of the persons authorized to represent, the transfer of the power of representation and its limits. Below, the power of representation in joint stock companies, especially the delegation of authority, is briefly discussed.
Exercise of Representative Authority
As a rule, the representation of the joint stock company in external relations belongs to the board of directors. A joint stock company is a merchant, and pursuant to Article 39/1 of the TCC, merchants are obliged to carry out the transactions related to their commercial enterprises under their commercial titles and to affix their signatures under the title. The “signature” of the joint stock company is the signature of its representatives. The power of representation is exercised through the signatures of authorized signatories under the trade name of the joint stock company. This rule is repeated in Article 372/2 of the TCC.
As a rule, the joint signature (double signature) of two of the representatives authorized to sign on behalf of the company is required. However, Article 370 of the TCC provides two exceptions to this rule. The first exception is where the articles of association of the company stipulates a different rule than double signature. The second exception is when the board of directors consists of a single member.
As a rule the board of directors appoints the authorized signatories who will represent the company with their signatures under the company title. Likewise, the board of directors also determines whether the authorized signatories are authorized to represent the company with their single signatures or jointly.
Pursuant to Article 371/7 of the TCC, the board of directors may appoint non-representative members of the board of directors or persons bound to the company by a service contract as commercial agents or other merchant assistants with limited authority, except for the representatives specified pursuant to Article 371/1 of the TCC. The duties and powers of the persons to be appointed in this manner must be clearly defined in the internal directive to be prepared in accordance with Article 367 of the TCC, and must be registered and announced in the trade registry. Commercial agents and other merchant assistants cannot be appointed with the internal directive specified in Article 371/7 of the TCC. It is considered that what is meant here is “commercial agent” and “other merchant assistants”, the general scope of which is regulated under the Turkish Code of Obligations No. 6098 (Art. 551 and 552).[2] Pursuant to Article 371/7 of the TCC, commercial agents or other merchant assistants with limited authority shall also be registered and announced in the trade registry. The board of directors is jointly and severally liable for any damage caused by these persons to the company and third parties.
Article 373 of the TCC requires the board of directors to register and announce the persons authorized to represent and the form of representation.
Limitations to the Representative Authority
As a rule, the authority of authorized signatories to represent the company cannot be restricted, except for the exceptions specified in the Law. Thus, it is aimed to protect third parties who will make transactions with the company. Restriction of the representation authority in excess of the exceptions specified in the Law, even if this restriction is registered and announced in the trade registry, does not bind the bona fide persons who make transactions with the company. These limitations shall only be effective for persons who are aware of the limitation imposed on the representation authority.
As in the abrogated law, excluding the article 371/1 of the TCC, the TCC introduces two exceptions to the principle that the power of representation cannot be restricted. Accordingly, the representation authority of authorized signatories may be limited only by the business areas of the company's head office or branch office, or by introducing a double signature rule. For example, the authorized signatories may be divided into Group A and Group B signatories, and the joint signature of two authorized signatories from different groups may be required.
Pursuant to Article 125/2 of the TCC, transactions that are outside the purpose and scope of business of the joint stock company shall also bind the company. Accordingly, unless it is proved that the third parties transacting with the company knew or could have known that the transaction in question was outside the company's field of activity, transactions outside the field of activity shall also bind the company. Therefore, the ultra vires principle under Article 137 of the abrogated TCC, which renders the transactions outside the company's field of activity null and void, was abandoned with the publication of the TCC in the Official Gazette on February 14, 2011.
A similar situation exists with respect to transactions contrary to the articles of association or general assembly resolutions. Accordingly, bona fide third parties may apply to the company even if there is a transaction contrary to the articles of association or general assembly resolution.
Transfer of the Representative Authority
The TCC allows the board of directors to delegate both management and representative authority. Therefore, the TCC paves the way for a non-executive board of directors.
Article 367 of the TCC regarding the delegation of management authority requires both a provision in the articles of association permitting such delegation and an internal directive. Although Art. 370/2 of the TCC regarding the delegation of representative authority does not require these conditions, it is argued in the doctrine that these two provisions should be evaluated together.[3] Unlike the delegation of management, the power of representation cannot be delegated entirely to third party managers who are not board members. Pursuant to Article 370/2 of the TCC, at least one member must have the power of representation. In the doctrine, it is argued that this member should not be subject to any restrictions, such as the requirement to act together with another director. In companies where the board of directors is composed of only one person, it is argued that even in the event of a transfer in violation of Art. 370/2, the board of directors has the authority to represent the company due to the nature of the business.[4]
Transfer of the Power to Appoint or Release Representatives
The non-transferable and inalienable duties and powers of the board of directors are also important for the delegation of representation authority. Pursuant to Article 375/1(d) of the TCC, “the appointment and release from office of the managers and persons with the same function and signatory authority” are among the non-transferable and inalienable powers of the board of directors.
When the obligation to register and announce the authorized signatories introduced by Art. 373 of the TCC, and the fact that the appointment and release of authorized signatories is considered as an inalienable and non-transferable power are evaluated together, the following conclusion may be drawn: The legislator may have aimed to appoint all persons authorized to represent the company with their signatures from a single source and to ensure publicity by announcing these persons.
An examination of the justification of Article 375 of the TCC leads to the conclusion that these non-transferable and inalienable powers may not be delegated even to the managing directors or third parties through delegation of authority. Literally, this provision of the TCC covers not only the appointment and removal of the persons authorized for high-level representation, but also the appointment and removal of the manager and all persons with the same function, and all authorized signatories.
Currently, in practice, the board of directors regulates the senior signatories with signature circulars. However, the non-transferability of the authority to appoint and remove all authorized signatories causes significant problems in practice. First of all, the appointment and removal of all persons authorized to sign on behalf of the company (for example, the authorized signatories at each branch in banks) individually, and seeking a resolution of the board of directors for their removal, causes a significant increase in workload. In one of its decisions, the Court of Cassation alleviated this burden to some extent by deciding that commercial representatives may be appointed by the articles of association of the company in all commercial companies.[5] In addition, considering that the members of the board of directors, especially in multinational companies, cannot take decisions at any time, seeking a board resolution for each authorized signatory creates a significant difficulty. Therefore, it is very important to determine the scope of the expression “managers and persons with the same function and authorized signatories”.
The scope of authorized signatories is controversial in the doctrine. According to one opinion, commercial agents and commercial representatives are within this scope.[6] One opinion argues that all authorized signatories fall within this scope; however, this expression should be interpreted narrowly and the signatures remaining in the internal relationship and the signatories authorized to sign documents regarding electricity, water and natural gas subscriptions should not be considered within this scope.[7] According to another opinion, the interpretation should be made in accordance with the purpose and it should be accepted that this article covers only senior management, regardless of the justification.[8]
There is no clear solution to this debate in the doctrine in the case law. To exemplify this situation in the case of banks, the Istanbul Regional Court of Appeals ruled in one of its decisions[9] that bank branch managers are of a different nature from the concept of “manager”, for the appointment of which a resolution of the board of directors is required under Article 375 of the TCC, in accordance with the banking legislation, and that a resolution of the board of directors is not required for their appointment. However, since the Court of Cassation has adopted a very inclusive application of Article 375 of the TCC, it requires the appointment of branch managers of banks by a resolution of the Board of Directors without evaluating their duties and definitions.[10] In the doctrine, there are authors who argue that branch managers and other managers defined in the Banking Law should be evaluated differently from the concept of “manager” under Article 375 of the TCC[11]. Accordingly, branch managers are the managers who are authorized to manage and represent the branch and do not have any authority covering the entire company, whereas Article 375 of the TCC refers to the managers who are authorized to manage the entire company. However, the current case law of the Court of Cassation does not accept this view.
Considering the difficulties that may arise in practice and the need to act pragmatically, this provision may not be interpreted strictly. As a matter of fact, Article 716a/4 of the Swiss Code of Obligations includes the delegation of management and representation authority among the non-transferable powers of the board of directors. In some of its decisions, the Swiss Federal Court states that this provision covers only senior executives. In Turkish law, doctrine and jurisprudence may decide that this provision should be applied only to senior executives. Similarly, it may also be argued that this provision should be applied only to persons who are permanently authorized to sign. Thus, it may be argued that signatories, commercial agents and proxies authorized to perform a business shall be appointed by the board of directors itself; however, these persons may temporarily authorize third parties. If this interpretation is adopted, the persons authorized by the board of directors may only grant power of attorney to third parties for certain works.
Conclusion
The authority to represent joint stock companies belongs to the board of directors. The board of directors registers and announces the persons authorized to represent, determines the form of representation and may transfer the representative authority if it wishes. However, at least one member of the board of directors must be authorized to represent the company.
The TCC has abandoned the principle of ultra vires. Accordingly, all transactions made by authorized signatories are binding on the company, even if they are not within the scope of the company's field of activity.
The appointment and removal of authorized signatories are among the inalienable and non-transferable powers of the board of directors. However, when evaluating this obligation, it is very important whether all authorized signatories are within the scope. Except for the senior signatories, it is controversial whether it is obligatory for the board of directors to appoint all authorized signatories for certain works. This obligation, which will be shaped by doctrine and case law, may be interpreted narrowly for practical reasons.
- Official Gazette, 14 February 2011, No. 27846.
- Kırca, İsmail: “https://www.lexpera.com.tr/literatur/batider-makaleler/ttk-m-371-7-hakkinda-bir-inceleme-ab-ye-uyelik-yolunda-geri-adim-ttk-m-371-7-hakkinda-bir-inceleme”
- Tekinalp, Ünal: “The New Joint Stock and Limited Liability Partnership Law and the Principles of One Man Companies (Yeni Anonim ve Limited Ortaklıklar Hukuku ile Tek Kişi Ortaklığının Esasları)”, Reviewed and Revised 2. Edition, Istanbul 2011, p. 141 N. 12-75.
- Kırca/Şehirali Çelik/Manavgat: “Joint Stock Company Law (Anonim Şirketler Hukuku), Volume 1, Fundamental Concepts and Principles, Incorporation and the Board of Directors (Temel Kavram ve İlkeler, Kuruluş Yönetim Kurulu)”, Ankara 2013, p. 628, 629.
- 12th Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation, E. 2017/5549, K. 2018/7155, 03.07.2018, www.kazanci.com.tr
- Pulaşlı, Hasan: “Commentary on Corporate Law Under the Turkish Commercial Code no. 6102 (6102 Sayılı Türk Ticaret Kanununa Göre Şirketler Hukuku Şerhi)”, Volume I, Ankara 2001, p. 958, par. 251.
- Tekinalp, Ünal: “The New Joint Stock and Limited Liability Partnership Law”, p. 130, par. 12-45.
- Güney, Necla Akdağ: “Joint Stock Company Board of Directors (Anonim Şirket Yönetim Kurulu)”, İstanbul 2012, p. 91.
- Istanbul Regional Court of Appeals 13th Civil Chamber, E. 2018/226, K. 2018/1106, T. 15.11.2018, www.lexpera.com
- 11th Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation, E. 2016/1223, K. 2017/3709, 14.06.2017, www.kazanci.com.tr
- Tekinalp, Ünal: “New Law of Capital Partnerships (Sermaye Ortaklıklarının Yeni Hukuku)”, 4th Edition, Istanbul 2015, p. 246
All rights of this article are reserved. This article may not be used, reproduced, copied, published, distributed, or otherwise disseminated without quotation or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm's written consent. Any content created without citing the resource or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm’s written consent is regularly tracked, and legal action will be taken in case of violation.
Other Contents
The Turkish automobile and light commercial vehicle market left the 2000s behind with steadily rising sales figures and the 2010s with high and stable sales figures as well. In this period, the growth of the market was driven not only by high purchase power but also by easy access to credit and product diversity...
Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 ("TCC") provides the right to exit from the company to the shareholders of limited liability companies and the right to squeeze out the shareholder from the company, unlike the structure of joint stock companies, with the exit and squeeze out institutions specially regulated for...
Ordinary partnerships are regulated under Turkish Law between Articles 620 and 645 of the Turkish Code of Obligations No. 6098 (“TCO” or the “Code”). The Law defines an ordinary partnership contract as a contract where two or more persons undertake to combine their labour or property to achieve a common...
Merger and acquisition processes are one of the legal processes that most seriously affect the identities and legal status of companies. After the completion of legal, tax, financial and operational due diligence reports, the parties initiate the negotiation process in case they reach an agreement on proceeding with the...
A popular business model for expanding market reach and brand recognition worldwide is franchising. Despite being less common than distribution agreements in the form of mono-brand store agreements, franchising is another significant method for extending luxury brands' distribution networks. Luxury brands use...
In the decision dated 14.06.2022 and numbered 2019/149 E. 2022/894 K., the Court of Cassation General Assembly (“CCGA”) evaluated the theory of piercing the corporate veil in the context of the relationship between the guarantor and the borrowing company in a dispute arising from a loan agreement...
The European Union continues to be an important investment center for foreign investors. According to data from the European Commission's "Second Annual Report on the monitoring of foreign direct investment in the European Union", the European Union received €117 billion worth of foreign direct investment in...
Transfer of shares is arguably the first legal transaction that comes to mind among the legal transactions regarding the shares of a capital company, and the most common transaction in practice. However, the shares of a capital company may also be subject to various transactions, other than share purchase...
Law No. 6563 on the Regulation of Electronic Commerce (E-commerce Law or Law) has recently undergone a radical change in order to regulate the behavior of the players in the rapidly growing and developing e-commerce sector. The new regulations that came into force as of January 1, 2023 envisage important...
On 11 June 2021, the German Federal Parliament approved the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (Lieferkettensorgfaltsgesetz) (“Act”) which affects not only German entities but also their suppliers in foreign countries (including Turkish entities). The main focus of the Act, which entered into force on...
On 21 December 2007, the Federal Council approved the draft revision of the Swiss Code of Obligations, which also includes amendments to company law. On 28 November 2014, the Federal Council referred the draft revision for consultation. Following extensive discussions and a long enactment process, the...
The Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 ("TCC") regulates maritime trade contracts under the fourth part of the fifth book of the Code. Among the types of contracts regulated in this section, the most frequently used contract in international maritime transport practice is the freight contract regulated under...
Prohibition on hidden income shifting is one of the most important issues that is broadly regulated under Capital Markets Law No. 6362 (“CML”). In conjunction with CML Article 21, which has a broader context than Article 15 of the abrogated Capital Markets Law No. 2499, another significant step has been taken...
As a result of developing commercial activities and large-scale investments, especially concluded in the fields of construction, energy and mining, companies are seeking to participate in these investments by uniting their powers and expertise to take advantage of financial opportunities together. This tendency...
The Turkish Commercial Code (“TCC” or “Law”) has enabled companies to apply different structural models and to implement new legal formations by including spin-off provisions to its Article 159 et seq. In accordance with the provisions of the law, companies may transfer a certain element, or elements, of their...
The International Federation of Consulting Engineers is a professional association established in 1913, known as the FIDIC (Fédération Internationale Des Ingénieurs-Counseils). Its members are duly elected from consultant-engineer associations of various countries, and membership to the association is...
Incoterms are a set of rules introduced by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) to explain the commercial terms that are widely used in international trade. The purpose of Incoterms rules is to facilitate and expedite international trade in a safe and secure manner...
The regulation applicable to all Turkish ports prepared by the Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications that entered into force after being published in the official gazette on October 31, 2012 (˝the Regulation˝), consolidates all the bylaws, regulations and instructions in a single Regulation...
As a rule, rights and obligations arising from an agreement have legal consequences only between the creditor and the debtor which are parties to the agreement. This principle is referred to as "privity of contract." In general, contracts for the benefit of third parties, where the fulfillment of an...
The rules of e-commerce, which grow and develop with the digitalizing world, are changing. E-commerce has become the driving force of the digital economy. However, considering the growth rate of e-commerce and the transformation it has undergone in a short time, it is obvious that some...
The dissolution of a company is a specific type of dissolution, which results in the cancellation of the legal personality which was gained by registration at incorporation. The specific proceeding which leads to the dissolution, and thus, the termination of a company upon the constitutive decision...
Companies in which shares or authority to manage is held by members of a family are considered to be “family businesses”. Family members can hold shares that control the company, as well as retain management authority. Having a family business means opportunity, security and income for...
Turkey ratified the Convention on the Contract for International Carriage of Goods by Road (“CMR”) in accordance with Act No. 3939 dated 7 December 1993, and the CMR entered into force in Turkey on 31 October 1995. In accordance with Article 1 / 1 of the CMR, the carriage of goods by road...
Ordinary partnerships are governed by Article 620 et seq. of the Turkish Code of Obligations No. 6098 (“TCO”). An ordinary partnership agreement is defined as an agreement whereby two or more persons undertake to join efforts and/or goods to reach a common goal...
The concept of disguised profit transfer in joint stock companies, in its broadest meaning, covers the transfer of company assets to related parties and may occur in different ways. This concept is regulated in detail under capital markets legislation...
Share subscription agreements, which are commonly encountered in start-up investments, set out the terms and conditions of an investor’s participation in a company as a shareholder by subscribing the new shares issued in a capital increase...
The electronic signature, which has the same legal consequences as wet signatures if it meets certain conditions, has taken its place in many legal systems and has enhanced commercial life. Although there are various types and applications in different legal systems...
INCOTERMS are a set of rules introduced by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) to explain the commercial terms that are widely used in international trade. The purpose of the Incoterms rules is to contribute to and facilitate the safe and swift conduct of international trade...