Deadlock in Joint Stock Companies
Introduction
The common goal (in the ideal world) of people who become shareholders by participating in the capital of a company or managers by participating in the management body is to manage the company in the best way and to obtain maximum economic benefit. Although it is expected that people who share this common goal will always be in consensus in the ideal world, it is quite possible to have conflicts in the real world. The fact that these conflicts disable the company from acting is legally defined as a "deadlock". The best solution to the occurrence of the worst-case scenario, or in other words, the deadlock, is to determine from the beginning how this process will be managed and how the company will regain its functionality. This newsletter article focuses on deadlocks in joint stock companies and solution suggestions.
Deadlock
In practice and the doctrine, deadlock is defined as a situation in which the members of the bodies of a joint stock company or shareholders vote differently or do not attend the meeting due to differences of opinion or conflicts of interest, and as a result of such reasons, the company body becomes unable to take decisions on any matter or on matters that are important for the activities and functioning of the company under the valid meeting and decision quorums.[1]
Companies whose main purpose is to generate economic benefits are expected to provide direct/indirect value first to their shareholders, then to their employees and also to other people with whom they have commercial relations, and perhaps even to the national economy, depending on the scale of the company. However, when a company enters a state of deadlock and loses its functionality, the company becomes unable to take any action. It is quite likely that a company in this situation will not be able to keep its current status quo, and also lose value and incur losses day by day. The micro- and macro-scale damages arising from this situation mean that the company will cause negative effects on the outside world.
This deadlock between shareholders and/or board members can prevent the company from taking action on even the simplest issues. In such cases, how the company will be able to function again should be determined with the correct legal instruments before the company enters a state of deadlock. Otherwise, it may be left to the discretion of the dispute resolution authorities as the only remedy to rescue the company, which is already in an immobilized state.
Appearances of Deadlock
Deadlocks may occur in general assemblies or boards of directors of joint stock companies. In these bodies, which are composed of multiple shareholders and board members, deadlocks may occur in various ways. Below, various appearances of deadlock in terms of general assemblies and boards of directors are discussed.
In terms of General Assembly
Firstly, the possibility that the general assembly cannot convene from the very beginning due to the failure to meet the meeting quorum will be discussed. Under Article 418 of the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 ("TCC"), general assemblies convene with the presence of the shareholders or their representatives who hold shares representing at least one-fourth of the share capital, except in cases where the TCC or the articles of association stipulate a higher quorum. Especially in cases of aggravated quorum, the absence of certain shareholders from the meeting may lead to failure to meet the quorum. However, it should be noted that under Article 418 of the TCC, if the quorum is not reached in the first meeting (except in cases where there is a special provision), no quorum shall be sought for the second meeting to be held. Therefore, it can be said that the failure here will not last for a period which can be defined as a deadlock.
Another appearance may be that the general assembly is never called for a meeting. As a general principle, the authority to convene the General Assembly belongs to the board of directors. If the Board of Directors does not convene the General Assembly (or fails to convene the General Assembly due to a deadlock in the Board of Directors), the General Assembly may become unable to convene. In this case, as a solution, even a single shareholder may convene the general assembly with the permission of the court under Article 410 of TCC. Therefore, this scenario is also likely to be resolved without turning into a deadlock.
Although the meeting quorum for the general assembly meeting is met, failure to meet the quorum for the resolution of the issues on the agenda may lead the company to a deadlock situation. There are opinions that to talk about a deadlock situation, either no decision should be taken on any issue or at least no decision should be taken on important issues that are indispensable in terms of the shareholding structure or activities.[2] A deadlock may also occur if the general assembly constantly rejects the agenda items or if there is constant equality in the decisions to be taken.[3] Another possibility is that shareholders who are granted "veto rights" and whose affirmative votes are required on certain issues may prevent the company's decisions on strategic issues by continuously voting negatively on these issues.
In terms of Board of Directors
Under Article 390 of the TCC, unless there is an aggravating provision to the contrary in the articles of association, the board of directors convenes with the majority of the total number of its members and takes its decisions with the majority of the members present at the meeting. If these quorums cannot be reached due to the non-attendance of certain member(s), the board of directors may become unable to take resolutions and a deadlock may occur. Another possibility is that the votes cast at the meeting are equal despite the meeting quorums being met. Under Article 390/3 of the TCC, if the votes are equal, the matter shall be discussed at the next meeting. If there is equality in the second meeting as well, the proposal in question shall be deemed rejected. Thus, the Board of Directors can be deadlocked as a result of equal voting.
Similar to the general assembly, there may be a possibility that the board of directors is never called for a meeting. Under Article 392/7 of TCC, each member of the board of directors may request the chairman in writing to call the board of directors for a meeting. There are opinions in the doctrine that in cases where the call is not made by the chairman of the board of directors, the decisions taken at that meeting shall be deemed as "null and void". Therefore, since the decisions taken in the board of directors meeting that is not duly convened are null and void, it is considered that a deadlock may occur.[4]
Contractual Solution Mechanisms
Solution by Negotiations
The solution to the deadlock situations mentioned above may be regulated in the shareholders' agreement to be signed by the shareholders of the company. Here, the definition of the deadlock, the duration of the deadlock, the solution mechanisms to be applied and how the solution mechanisms will operate should be regulated in detail. Thus, how these problems will be overcome can be determined in advance before the company becomes unable to function.
Firstly, a process can be designed under the shareholders' agreement for the solution of the deadlock by the parties themselves. Within the scope of this process, a certain period may be stipulated for the parties to solve the deadlock. Here, the parties are expected to make efforts to resolve the problem amicably and in good faith.
If the parties are unable to resolve the problem on their own within the stipulated period, it may be arranged that the problem will be resolved by a third party or a committee. This process, which will be jointly designed by the parties before the deadlock occurs, may help to resolve the deadlock more quickly and easily.
Solution by Share Options
The main mechanisms regulated in shareholders' agreements for deadlocks are share options. If a call option is granted, a shareholder has the right to purchase some or all of the shares of other shareholders. If a put option is granted, a shareholder may sell some or all of its shares to other shareholders. As for the tag-along right, when a shareholder sells their shares, other shareholders have the right to participate in this sale. If it is desired that other shareholders shall be obliged to sell their shares, a drag-along right can be regulated. For detailed information on these options, please refer to our article titled "Options and Similar Rights of Shareholders in Respect of the Shares of Joint Stock Companies".[5]
Finally, shoot-out provisions may be considered as a solution to deadlock. Under the shoot-out provisions, in the event of a deadlock, each shareholder has the right to initiate a procedure that results in the transfer of all of the shares of the other shareholder to itself or, on the contrary, the transfer of all of its shares to the other shareholder. However, unlike the call or put options, in this procedure, it is not initially clear which of the two shareholders will acquire the company shares and at what price. Which shareholder will exit the company by transferring his shares and the price to be paid for the shares to be acquired will be shaped according to the course of the procedure.[6]
Legal Solution Mechanisms
If the deadlock cannot be resolved, especially in cases such as the failure of the general assembly to convene or the failure to elect the members of the board of directors whose terms have expired, it is also possible to request the dissolution of the company on the grounds of lack of company bodies under Article 530 of TCC.[7]
Under Article 530 of the TCC, if one of the legally required bodies of the company is absent for a long period, or if the general assembly is unable to convene, upon the request of the shareholders, the company's creditors or the Ministry of Customs and Trade, the commercial court of first instance in the place where the company's head office is located shall, after hearing the board of directors, set a deadline for the company to bring its situation into compliance with the law. If the situation is not corrected within this period, the court shall decide to dissolve the company. If the expression "for a long period" in the article coincides with the state of deadlock, this article may be applicable.
There are opinions that deadlock may also constitute a just cause for the dissolution of the company within the scope of Article 531 of TCC. Under Article 531 of the TCC, in the presence of just cause, the holders of the shares representing at least one-tenth of the share capital and twentieth in publicly traded companies may request the commercial court of first instance in the place where the company's head office is located to decide on the dissolution of the company. Instead of dissolution, the court may order the plaintiff shareholders to pay the real value of their shares as of the date closest to the date of the decision and to remove the plaintiff shareholders from the company, or to make an appropriate and acceptable settlement.
- Sevi, Ali Murat: “Anonim Ortaklık Organlarında Kilitlenme Hâli ve Hukukî Çözüm Yolları.” Tüzel Kişilik Penceresinden Anonim Ortaklık Sempozyumu, 2021, ss. 325-328
- Sevi, s. 32.
- Çeçen, Muhammed: “Anonim ortaklık hukukunda sermayeye katılmalı ortak girişimlerde kilitlenmeler ve çözüm yöntemleri.“ Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, 2023, S. 88.
- Çeçen, 78.
- Çolgar, Tuna: “Options and Similiar Rights of Shareholders in respect of the Shares of Joint Stock Companies” Erdem & Erdem Hukuk Postası, Eylül 2016
- Özdin, Funda. “Eşit Sermaye Payına Sahip (50:50) İki Kişilik Sermaye Şirketlerinde Kilitlenmelerin Çözümü Amacına Yönelik Radikal Bir Çözüm Mekanizması: Shoot-Out Klozları.” Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Dergisi, 39. cilt2023, ss. 1076-1081
- Sevi, s. 387.
All rights of this article are reserved. This article may not be used, reproduced, copied, published, distributed, or otherwise disseminated without quotation or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm's written consent. Any content created without citing the resource or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm’s written consent is regularly tracked, and legal action will be taken in case of violation.
Other Contents
The most common forms of agency agreements can be categorized under three main headings. These can be listed as an Agency Agreement, Distributorship Agreement, and Franchise Agreement...
Employee shareholding, which means the ownership of some or all of the capital of a publicly traded or closed company by employees, has attracted great interest in many countries around the world, particularly in the United States of America, due to the advantages it provides to the national economy, the...
There are many different rules that newly established companies must consider and comply with when starting their commercial activities. One of these rules is the "Evasion of Law" article regulated under Article 356 of the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 ("TCC"). The relevant rule aims to prevent the...
The Turkish automobile and light commercial vehicle market left the 2000s behind with steadily rising sales figures and the 2010s with high and stable sales figures as well. In this period, the growth of the market was driven not only by high purchase power but also by easy access to credit and product diversity...
Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 ("TCC") provides the right to exit from the company to the shareholders of limited liability companies and the right to squeeze out the shareholder from the company, unlike the structure of joint stock companies, with the exit and squeeze out institutions specially regulated for...
Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 (“TCC”) preserves the rule that the board of directors shall manage and represent joint stock companies. The TCC regulates how the power of representation shall be exercised, the registration and announcement of the persons authorized to represent, the transfer of the...
Ordinary partnerships are regulated under Turkish Law between Articles 620 and 645 of the Turkish Code of Obligations No. 6098 (“TCO” or the “Code”). The Law defines an ordinary partnership contract as a contract where two or more persons undertake to combine their labour or property to achieve a common...
Merger and acquisition processes are one of the legal processes that most seriously affect the identities and legal status of companies. After the completion of legal, tax, financial and operational due diligence reports, the parties initiate the negotiation process in case they reach an agreement on proceeding with the...
A popular business model for expanding market reach and brand recognition worldwide is franchising. Despite being less common than distribution agreements in the form of mono-brand store agreements, franchising is another significant method for extending luxury brands' distribution networks. Luxury brands use...
In the decision dated 14.06.2022 and numbered 2019/149 E. 2022/894 K., the Court of Cassation General Assembly (“CCGA”) evaluated the theory of piercing the corporate veil in the context of the relationship between the guarantor and the borrowing company in a dispute arising from a loan agreement...
The European Union continues to be an important investment center for foreign investors. According to data from the European Commission's "Second Annual Report on the monitoring of foreign direct investment in the European Union", the European Union received €117 billion worth of foreign direct investment in...
Transfer of shares is arguably the first legal transaction that comes to mind among the legal transactions regarding the shares of a capital company, and the most common transaction in practice. However, the shares of a capital company may also be subject to various transactions, other than share purchase...
Law No. 6563 on the Regulation of Electronic Commerce (E-commerce Law or Law) has recently undergone a radical change in order to regulate the behavior of the players in the rapidly growing and developing e-commerce sector. The new regulations that came into force as of January 1, 2023 envisage important...
On 11 June 2021, the German Federal Parliament approved the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (Lieferkettensorgfaltsgesetz) (“Act”) which affects not only German entities but also their suppliers in foreign countries (including Turkish entities). The main focus of the Act, which entered into force on...
On 21 December 2007, the Federal Council approved the draft revision of the Swiss Code of Obligations, which also includes amendments to company law. On 28 November 2014, the Federal Council referred the draft revision for consultation. Following extensive discussions and a long enactment process, the...
The Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 ("TCC") regulates maritime trade contracts under the fourth part of the fifth book of the Code. Among the types of contracts regulated in this section, the most frequently used contract in international maritime transport practice is the freight contract regulated under...
Prohibition on hidden income shifting is one of the most important issues that is broadly regulated under Capital Markets Law No. 6362 (“CML”). In conjunction with CML Article 21, which has a broader context than Article 15 of the abrogated Capital Markets Law No. 2499, another significant step has been taken...
As a result of developing commercial activities and large-scale investments, especially concluded in the fields of construction, energy and mining, companies are seeking to participate in these investments by uniting their powers and expertise to take advantage of financial opportunities together. This tendency...
The Turkish Commercial Code (“TCC” or “Law”) has enabled companies to apply different structural models and to implement new legal formations by including spin-off provisions to its Article 159 et seq. In accordance with the provisions of the law, companies may transfer a certain element, or elements, of their...
The International Federation of Consulting Engineers is a professional association established in 1913, known as the FIDIC (Fédération Internationale Des Ingénieurs-Counseils). Its members are duly elected from consultant-engineer associations of various countries, and membership to the association is...
Incoterms are a set of rules introduced by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) to explain the commercial terms that are widely used in international trade. The purpose of Incoterms rules is to facilitate and expedite international trade in a safe and secure manner...
The regulation applicable to all Turkish ports prepared by the Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications that entered into force after being published in the official gazette on October 31, 2012 (˝the Regulation˝), consolidates all the bylaws, regulations and instructions in a single Regulation...
As a rule, rights and obligations arising from an agreement have legal consequences only between the creditor and the debtor which are parties to the agreement. This principle is referred to as "privity of contract." In general, contracts for the benefit of third parties, where the fulfillment of an...
The rules of e-commerce, which grow and develop with the digitalizing world, are changing. E-commerce has become the driving force of the digital economy. However, considering the growth rate of e-commerce and the transformation it has undergone in a short time, it is obvious that some...
The dissolution of a company is a specific type of dissolution, which results in the cancellation of the legal personality which was gained by registration at incorporation. The specific proceeding which leads to the dissolution, and thus, the termination of a company upon the constitutive decision...
Companies in which shares or authority to manage is held by members of a family are considered to be “family businesses”. Family members can hold shares that control the company, as well as retain management authority. Having a family business means opportunity, security and income for...
Turkey ratified the Convention on the Contract for International Carriage of Goods by Road (“CMR”) in accordance with Act No. 3939 dated 7 December 1993, and the CMR entered into force in Turkey on 31 October 1995. In accordance with Article 1 / 1 of the CMR, the carriage of goods by road...
Ordinary partnerships are governed by Article 620 et seq. of the Turkish Code of Obligations No. 6098 (“TCO”). An ordinary partnership agreement is defined as an agreement whereby two or more persons undertake to join efforts and/or goods to reach a common goal...
The concept of disguised profit transfer in joint stock companies, in its broadest meaning, covers the transfer of company assets to related parties and may occur in different ways. This concept is regulated in detail under capital markets legislation...
Share subscription agreements, which are commonly encountered in start-up investments, set out the terms and conditions of an investor’s participation in a company as a shareholder by subscribing the new shares issued in a capital increase...
The electronic signature, which has the same legal consequences as wet signatures if it meets certain conditions, has taken its place in many legal systems and has enhanced commercial life. Although there are various types and applications in different legal systems...
INCOTERMS are a set of rules introduced by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) to explain the commercial terms that are widely used in international trade. The purpose of the Incoterms rules is to contribute to and facilitate the safe and swift conduct of international trade...