Liability Arising from Trust in Corporate Law
Introduction
With the proliferation of group of companies’ structures, the need to protect the trust placed in the reputation of the group has gained importance. Article 209 of the Turkish Commercial Code ("TCC") regulates the liability of the parent company arising from the trust created in third parties using the group's reputation. This study examines the theoretical foundations of the said provision, its conditions of application, and its practical manifestations considering judicial decisions.
Article 209 of the TCC, titled "Liability arising from trust," reads as follows: "The parent company shall be liable for the trust created by the use of the group's reputation in cases where such reputation has reached a level that inspires confidence in the public or consumers.”
The provision exclusively regulates the liability arising from the use of trust placed in the reputation of a group of companies and constitutes a specific manifestation of the general doctrine of liability arising from trust. It derives from this general doctrine and from the concept of "Konzern trust liability" as crystallised in the Swiss Federal Court's Wibru/Swissair decision[1].
The fundamental condition of liability is the element of "use of reputation". Whether the reputation has been used is determined according to the circumstances of each case[2]. It is not strictly necessary that the name be expressly stated or that the group logo be visibly displayed for such use to be established[3].
For trust liability to arise, the parent company must have engaged in conduct particularly apt to inspire trust, the counterparty must have relied on the trust so created, the trust must be worthy of protection, and the trusting party must have made a disposition in reliance on that trust[4].
The legal nature of liability arising from trust is debated in the doctrine. According to one view, it may be assessed within the scope of tort liability[5]; Tekinalp characterises it as "culpa in contrahendo”[6] liability. According to another view, trust liability is not a "tort-like" or "contract-like" liability in the sense of the older dogmatic approach, but rather a sui generis statutory obligation[7]. Given that the legislator has regulated this liability through a specific provision, the view that trust liability constitutes a sui generis statutory obligation should be given precedence.
Conditions of Liability Pursuant to Article 209 of the TCC
Existence of a Group of Companies within the Meaning of the Turkish Commercial Code
To invoke the parent company's liability arising from trust, the existence of a group of companies within the context of the TCC is required. Under Turkish law, a group of companies arises where a commercial company comes under the dominance of another commercial company or enterprise that is legally independent from it.
The elements of dominance are regulated under Article 195 et seq. of the TCC. Circumstances such as the parent company holding the majority of voting rights in the subsidiary, having a say in its management, the existence of a dominance agreement, or exercising de facto control over the subsidiary indicate the existence of a group of companies. Since the legislator has deliberately confined the scope of the provision to groups of companies, Article 209 of the TCC does not apply in the absence of a group of companies within the meaning of Article 195 of the TCC.
In the context of Article 209 of the TCC, the addressee is the parent company that centralises the group's reputation within itself. Pursuant to Article 195 of the TCC, the provisions on groups of companies apply where the registered office of either the parent company or at least one of the subsidiaries is in Türkiye.
The Group's Reputation Reaching a Level That Inspires Confidence
For Article 209 of the TCC to apply, the group of companies must possess a certain reputation, and this reputation must have reached a level that inspires confidence in the public or consumers. The trust deemed worthy of legal protection is not the abstract inner confidence that the public feels towards reputable groups, but rather the concrete trust that the parent company creates in the counterparty through its own conduct within a specific business context[8].
The explanatory memorandum to Article 209 of the TCC states that not every group of companies falls within the scope of the provision and that the group's reputation must have reached a level that inspires confidence. The wording of the provision emphasises a widespread reputation rather than a merely local one.
To speak of liability, the parent company must inspire a high degree of trust through its own conduct within a specific business context and must cause damage to the counterparty by frustrating that trust in a manner contrary to good faith. The mere fact that the group constitutes a quality symbol is not taken as the basis for liability as an abstract form of trust[9].
In the doctrine, Battal determines the existence of reputation by criteria such as the parent company having an easily memorable name or brand, and the public or consumers turning to the subsidiary in reliance on the group's name. The 22nd Civil Chamber of the Ankara Regional Court of Appeal adopts the same view and states that where the group conducts its activities under a common brand name, persons in the vicinity would assume that they are dealing with one of several enterprises operating under a single umbrella[10].
Use of the Confidence-Inspiring Reputation in a Specific Transaction
For liability to arise under Article 209 of the TCC, it is not sufficient for the group of companies merely to possess a reputation that has reached a confidence-inspiring level. This reputation must have been used in the context of a specific legal transaction or a particular business dealing.
The central condition of liability is the use of reputation. In the absence of such use, mere membership in the group does not give rise to liability. Expressions relating to affiliation such as "a company of X / a subsidiary of X" or the use of the group logo alone are not sufficient. Whether the reputation has been used is determined on a case-by-case basis; where the disclosed tables, information, and quality do not correspond to the trust created, the parent company that has not objected to the use of its name shall be held liable for the resulting damage.
The use of reputation is a fact that inspires trust in the third party regarding the specific situation and influences their actions. This may occur through the parent company's own conduct, as well as through statements made by the subsidiary with the knowledge and approval of the parent company.
The 21st Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation states that for Article 209 of the TCC to apply, the subsidiary's liability must be contractual in nature and that the parent company cannot be held separately liable in cases of tort liability[11]. This approach is sound, as the use of reputation must result in the formation of a legal act or transaction. Since liability arising from trust is a fault-based liability, the parent company must have known or should have been able to know that a concrete expectation was being created in the counterparty.
In a 2020 decision, the 11th Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation requires, for a concrete expectation to arise, that the parent company or the group has provided the injured party with an oral or written assurance, a letter of credit or similar support, or a declaration in public announcements and advertisements indicating that the subsidiary is backed by the group[12]. The Chamber emphasises that it must be proven that the group's reputation was used in a manner that creates a concrete expectation on the basis of a specific transaction.
The 22nd Civil Chamber of the Ankara[13] Regional Court of Appeal states that the confidence-inspiring reputation must have been used in a specific or determinable field. The court concluded that the conditions of Article 209 of the TCC were not met in the case at hand, on the ground that there was no evidence that the parent company had provided the plaintiff with any oral or written assurance.
Fault and Damage
For the parent company's liability to arise, it must be at fault. Fault may take the form of intent, as well as negligence manifested by remaining silent in the face of the subsidiary's use of reputational elements. Even slight negligence may constitute fault, and under the contractual liability regime, the burden of proving absence of fault rests on the parent company. The İzmir 3rd Commercial Court of First Instance also expressly stated in its 2021 decision that this liability is a fault-based liability[14].
The other element required alongside fault is damage. Liability arises where the concrete and justified trust that the party in a legal relationship with the subsidiary has placed in the group has been frustrated and has caused damage. The scope of damage consists of the difference between the state in which the assets would have been had the breach of trust not occurred and their current state.
Applicability to Merchants
Whether the trust that merchants, who are subject to the duty of prudent conduct pursuant to Article 18/2 of the TCC, place in a group of companies can be protected under Article 209 of the TCC is assessed separately. Consumers are the group that can benefit most broadly from Article 209 of the TCC; [15]merchants, who are expected to safeguard their own interests with due care by virtue of the duty of prudent conduct, may only fall within the protective scope of the provision under stricter conditions. Indeed, the 22nd Civil Chamber of the Ankara Regional Court of Appeal confirmed this point in its 2021 decision[16].
Conclusion
Article 209 of the TCC is a specific manifestation of liability arising from trust, particular to groups of companies. The provision constitutes a sui generis statutory obligation. Its application requires, first and foremost, the existence of a group of companies within the meaning of Article 195 of the TCC. In the absence of a group relationship, the provision does not apply. It is further required that the group's reputation has reached a level that inspires confidence in the public or consumers. This trust is not an abstract perception of quality. It is the justified expectation that the parent company creates in the counterparty through its concrete conduct.
The central condition of liability is that the reputation has been used in the context of a specific legal transaction or business dealing. The mere indication of group affiliation is not deemed sufficient on its own. In addition, the parent company must be at fault. It is also required that the counterparty has suffered damage because of the frustration of trust.
As regards merchants, the conditions for falling within the protective scope of the provision are held to stricter standards by virtue of the duty of prudent conduct.
In conclusion, Article 209 of the TCC provides an important safeguard for the protection of third parties' trust in the group. However, the emergence of liability is subject to strict conditions. Judicial decisions also demonstrate that these conditions must be rigorously examined.
- Turkish Commercial Code Art. 209 Justification.
- Turkish Commercial Code Art. 209 Justification.
- Ahmet Battal, “Şirketler Topluluğunda Güvenden Doğan Sorumluluk”, Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2012, T. 18, V. 2, p. 245 – 254, p. 251; Abuzer Kendigelen, Türk Ticaret Kanunu Değişiklikler, Yenilikler ve İlk Tespitler, İstanbul, On İki Levha, 2011, p. 163.
- Gül Okutan Nilsson, Türk Ticaret Kanunu Tasarısı’na Göre Şirketler Topluluğu Hukuku, İstanbul, On İki Levha, 2009, p. 488; Asuman Yılmaz, Türk, İsviçre ve Alman Hukuklarında Şirketler Topluluğuna Güvenden Doğan Sorumluluk, İstanbul, On İki Levha, 2010, p. 298-299.
- Efe Dündar, Yeni Türk Ticaret Kanunu Çerçevesinde Çok Uluslu Şirketler, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2013, p. 204.
- Reha Poroy / Ünal Tekinalp / Ersin Çamoğlu, Ortaklıklar Hukuku II, 14. Bası, İstanbul, Vedat, 2019, p. 795.
- Hasan Pulaşlı, “Türk Ticaret Kanunu Tasarısına Göre Şirketler Topluluğunun Temel Nitelikleri ve Hâkim Şirketin Güven Sorumluluğu”, Gazi Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 2007, T. 11, V. 1-2, p. 259 – 277, p. 269; Baran Ulaş, Sermaye Şirketlerinde Sınırlı Sorumluluk İlkesinin İstisnası Olarak Tüzel Kişilik Perdesinin Kaldırılması, Ankara, Seçkin, 2020, p. 159.
- Tekinalp, p. 600, para. 23-158; Poroy/Tekinalp/Çamoğlu, p. 814.
- Başak Şit İmamoğlu, Planlı Eskitme, Ankara, Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Araştırma Enstitüsü, 2020, p. 339.
- Battal, p. 250.
- Court of Cassation 21st Civil Chamber, 2017/4601 File, 2017/7189 Decision, dated 3.10.2017; Court of Cassation 21st Civil Chamber, 2018/59 File, 2018/458 Decision, dated 23.1.2018; Court of Cassation 21st Civil Chamber, 2018/1430 File, 2018/3811 Decision, dated 16.4.2018.
- Court of Cassation 11th Civil Chamber, 2019/4830 File, 2020/4201 Decision, dated 19.10.2020.
- Ankara Regional Court of Appeal 22nd Civil Chamber, 2018/2489 File, 2021/1119 Decision, dated 24.6.2021.
- İzmir 3rd Commercial Court of First Instance, 2017/189 File, 2021/301 Decision, dated 26.3.2021.
- Battal, p. 252.
- Ankara Regional Court of Appeal 22nd Civil Chamber, 2018/2489 File, 2021/1119 Decision, dated 24.6.2021.
All rights of this article are reserved. This article may not be used, reproduced, copied, published, distributed, or otherwise disseminated without quotation or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm's written consent. Any content created without citing the resource or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm’s written consent is regularly tracked, and legal action will be taken in case of violation.
Other Contents
A change in control within a publicly held company should not be regarded merely as a quantitative shift in shareholding structure; rather, it constitutes a qualitative transformation that has significant implications for minority shareholders’ property rights, investment…
This legal post examines the decision of the 11th Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation numbered E.2024/1865, K.2025/478 (“Decision”). The Decision is significant in terms of the rejection of transfers of registered shares in joint stock companies by the board of directors, the legal validity of such rejection…
Capital increase in privately held joint stock companies is an important transaction that allows the company to grow and meet its financing needs by strengthening its equity structure. A capital increase means an increase in the amount of the company's ordinary/registered capital and is realized with the...
Article 408, paragraph 2, subparagraph (f) of the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 ("TCC") lists the "wholesale of a significant amount of company assets" among the unassignable and exclusive duties and powers of the general assembly. However, this provision does not clearly regulate what is meant by the...
To ensure economic stability in Turkiye and preservere the value of the Turkish Lira, an amendment was introduced to Decree No. 32 on the Protection of the Value of the Turkish Currency through Presidential Decree No. 85, published in the Official Gazette No. 30534, dated September 13, 2018. This regulation...
In the rapidly digitalizing world, e-commerce is spreading rapidly, strengthening the impact of sales made via the Internet and traditional channels. According to the Ministry of Trade data for 2023, Türkiye's e-commerce volume increased by 115.15% compared to the previous year, reaching 1.85 trillion Turkish liras...
In an extraordinary dissolution, ex officio cancellation from the trade registry without liquidation is regulated under the provisional Article 7 of the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 (“TCC”). Under Paragraph 15 of the relevant provision, the creditors of the company or cooperative, which was ex officio canceled...
As the global business landscape evolves, foreign companies increasingly seek to expand their presence in promising markets. Türkiye, positioned between Europe and Asia, offers suitable opportunities for this expansion. Among the methods foreign companies use to establish a foothold but not a company in...
In joint stock companies, the body in charge of managing and representing the company is the board of directors. The members of the board of directors are liable to the company for the damages caused by their negligence in the performance of their duties...
Sales contracts are the most common and most important contracts of commercial life . Determining the rights and obligations of the parties as a result of the defects encountered in the goods subject to the sale is one of the most common legal problems in commercial sales...
Under Article 365 of the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 ("TCC"), each member of the board of directors, which is the body responsible for the administration and representation of a joint stock company, is obliged to fulfill their duties arising from the law and the articles of association within the limits...
Law No. 7262 dated 27.12.2020 introduced an obligation to notify the Central Registry Agency (“CRA”) regarding the issuance and transfer of bearer shares under the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 (“TCC”) and stipulates that those who violate the notification requirement under Art. 486/2 of the TCC shall be...
Similar to previous years, in 2024, mergers and acquisitions (“M&A”) transactions continue to be shaped by global economic dynamics, geopolitical risks and technological innovations...
The common goal (in the ideal world) of people who become shareholders by participating in the capital of a company or managers by participating in the management body is to manage the company in the best way and to obtain maximum economic benefit...
The most common forms of agency agreements can be categorized under three main headings. These can be listed as an Agency Agreement, Distributorship Agreement, and Franchise Agreement...
Employee shareholding, which means the ownership of some or all of the capital of a publicly traded or closed company by employees, has attracted great interest in many countries around the world, particularly in the United States of America, due to the advantages it provides to the national economy, the...
There are many different rules that newly established companies must consider and comply with when starting their commercial activities. One of these rules is the "Evasion of Law" article regulated under Article 356 of the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 ("TCC"). The relevant rule aims to prevent the...
The Turkish automobile and light commercial vehicle market left the 2000s behind with steadily rising sales figures and the 2010s with high and stable sales figures as well. In this period, the growth of the market was driven not only by high purchase power but also by easy access to credit and product diversity...
Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 ("TCC") provides the right to exit from the company to the shareholders of limited liability companies and the right to squeeze out the shareholder from the company, unlike the structure of joint stock companies, with the exit and squeeze out institutions specially regulated for...
Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 (“TCC”) preserves the rule that the board of directors shall manage and represent joint stock companies. The TCC regulates how the power of representation shall be exercised, the registration and announcement of the persons authorized to represent, the transfer of the...
Merger and acquisition processes are one of the legal processes that most seriously affect the identities and legal status of companies. After the completion of legal, tax, financial and operational due diligence reports, the parties initiate the negotiation process in case they reach an agreement on proceeding with the...
A popular business model for expanding market reach and brand recognition worldwide is franchising. Despite being less common than distribution agreements in the form of mono-brand store agreements, franchising is another significant method for extending luxury brands' distribution networks. Luxury brands use...
In the decision dated 14.06.2022 and numbered 2019/149 E. 2022/894 K., the Court of Cassation General Assembly (“CCGA”) evaluated the theory of piercing the corporate veil in the context of the relationship between the guarantor and the borrowing company in a dispute arising from a loan agreement...
The European Union continues to be an important investment center for foreign investors. According to data from the European Commission's "Second Annual Report on the monitoring of foreign direct investment in the European Union", the European Union received €117 billion worth of foreign direct investment in...
Transfer of shares is arguably the first legal transaction that comes to mind among the legal transactions regarding the shares of a capital company, and the most common transaction in practice. However, the shares of a capital company may also be subject to various transactions, other than share purchase...
Law No. 6563 on the Regulation of Electronic Commerce (E-commerce Law or Law) has recently undergone a radical change in order to regulate the behavior of the players in the rapidly growing and developing e-commerce sector. The new regulations that came into force as of January 1, 2023 envisage important...
On 11 June 2021, the German Federal Parliament approved the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (Lieferkettensorgfaltsgesetz) (“Act”) which affects not only German entities but also their suppliers in foreign countries (including Turkish entities). The main focus of the Act, which entered into force on...
On 21 December 2007, the Federal Council approved the draft revision of the Swiss Code of Obligations, which also includes amendments to company law. On 28 November 2014, the Federal Council referred the draft revision for consultation. Following extensive discussions and a long enactment process, the...
The Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 ("TCC") regulates maritime trade contracts under the fourth part of the fifth book of the Code. Among the types of contracts regulated in this section, the most frequently used contract in international maritime transport practice is the freight contract regulated under...
Prohibition on hidden income shifting is one of the most important issues that is broadly regulated under Capital Markets Law No. 6362 (“CML”). In conjunction with CML Article 21, which has a broader context than Article 15 of the abrogated Capital Markets Law No. 2499, another significant step has been taken...
As a result of developing commercial activities and large-scale investments, especially concluded in the fields of construction, energy and mining, companies are seeking to participate in these investments by uniting their powers and expertise to take advantage of financial opportunities together. This tendency...
The Turkish Commercial Code (“TCC” or “Law”) has enabled companies to apply different structural models and to implement new legal formations by including spin-off provisions to its Article 159 et seq. In accordance with the provisions of the law, companies may transfer a certain element, or elements, of their...
The International Federation of Consulting Engineers is a professional association established in 1913, known as the FIDIC (Fédération Internationale Des Ingénieurs-Counseils). Its members are duly elected from consultant-engineer associations of various countries, and membership to the association is...
Incoterms are a set of rules introduced by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) to explain the commercial terms that are widely used in international trade. The purpose of Incoterms rules is to facilitate and expedite international trade in a safe and secure manner...
The regulation applicable to all Turkish ports prepared by the Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications that entered into force after being published in the official gazette on October 31, 2012 (˝the Regulation˝), consolidates all the bylaws, regulations and instructions in a single Regulation...
As a rule, rights and obligations arising from an agreement have legal consequences only between the creditor and the debtor which are parties to the agreement. This principle is referred to as "privity of contract." In general, contracts for the benefit of third parties, where the fulfillment of an...
The rules of e-commerce, which grow and develop with the digitalizing world, are changing. E-commerce has become the driving force of the digital economy. However, considering the growth rate of e-commerce and the transformation it has undergone in a short time, it is obvious that some...
The dissolution of a company is a specific type of dissolution, which results in the cancellation of the legal personality which was gained by registration at incorporation. The specific proceeding which leads to the dissolution, and thus, the termination of a company upon the constitutive decision...
Companies in which shares or authority to manage is held by members of a family are considered to be “family businesses”. Family members can hold shares that control the company, as well as retain management authority. Having a family business means opportunity, security and income for...
Turkey ratified the Convention on the Contract for International Carriage of Goods by Road (“CMR”) in accordance with Act No. 3939 dated 7 December 1993, and the CMR entered into force in Turkey on 31 October 1995. In accordance with Article 1 / 1 of the CMR, the carriage of goods by road...
Ordinary partnerships are governed by Article 620 et seq. of the Turkish Code of Obligations No. 6098 (“TCO”). An ordinary partnership agreement is defined as an agreement whereby two or more persons undertake to join efforts and/or goods to reach a common goal...
The concept of disguised profit transfer in joint stock companies, in its broadest meaning, covers the transfer of company assets to related parties and may occur in different ways. This concept is regulated in detail under capital markets legislation...
Share subscription agreements, which are commonly encountered in start-up investments, set out the terms and conditions of an investor’s participation in a company as a shareholder by subscribing the new shares issued in a capital increase...
The electronic signature, which has the same legal consequences as wet signatures if it meets certain conditions, has taken its place in many legal systems and has enhanced commercial life. Although there are various types and applications in different legal systems...
INCOTERMS are a set of rules introduced by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) to explain the commercial terms that are widely used in international trade. The purpose of the Incoterms rules is to contribute to and facilitate the safe and swift conduct of international trade...