New Horizons in Competition Law; Diesel Emissions Scandal
“No one is as blind as someone who doesn’t want to see.”
İbni Sina
Introduction
The United States of America Directorate of Environmental Protection announced in 2015 that the exhaust emission tests performed on Volkswagen (“VW”) diesel engine vehicles at the factory exit point were faulty[1]. Following this announcement, it was alleged that many German Automakers, amongst which BMW, Daimler, and VW groups also take part, had been manipulating exhaust emission rates. This situation rendered the millions of vehicles produced worldwide by the above-mentioned automakers controversial. It is alleged, however, that the exhaust emission tests performed at factory points of exit on 11 million vehicles manufactured only by VW were faulty.
In fact, many vehicles were also recalled due to airbag, gearbox problems, or other faulty issues, such as braking systems. However, the incident referred to as the “Diesel Emission Scandal” involves very different aspects than these noted issues. According to the alleged claims, the subject vehicles’ carbon emissions are being deliberately understated through software placed in the diesel engine vehicles. In other words, the manufacturers are deliberately understating the exhaust emission rates through software, thereby deceiving the consumers.
The Diesel Emission Scandal consumed the agenda of public opinion over the course of time. The stock share values of the aforesaid automakers decreased by the billions of dollars as a result of this scandal. Certain German cities imposed several prohibitions with respect to allowing entry of these diesel vehicles. However, the most important development was the VW settlement announcement regarding the claims for damages published by the USA Directorate of Environmental Protection[2]. Thus, VW settled, with prejudice, agreeing to pay billions of dollars in compensation by accepting the claims against it.
On 18 September 2018, namely, approximately three years after the Diesel Emission Scandal outbreak, the European Union Commission (“EU Commission”) announced that it had opened an investigation with respect to BMW, Daimler and VW (Volkswagen, Audi, Porsche) on charges of violating competition laws[3]. The EU Commission will investigate whether the automakers are part of an agreement that eliminates competition between them regarding the development and dissemination of emission-reducing technologies for gasoline and diesel vehicles. Thus, it will be examined whether automakers that are competitors for the development of emission technologies in gasoline and diesel vehicles are violating the competition laws by eliminating the technological competition between them.
Diesel Emission Scandal Investigation by EU Commission
The EU Commission took its first action regarding the Emission Scandal in October, 2017. The EU Commission announced on 20 October 2017 that they conducted on-the-spot investigations on the suspicion that these German Automakers are violating the competition laws[4]. The EU Commission closely followed the developments regarding the Diesel Emission Scandal over the course of time, and continued to monitor events as they unfolded. However, in its press release dated 18 September 2018, the EU Commission clearly indicated that at this time, automakers, such as VW, BMW and Daimler are being investigated regarding the Diesel Emission Scandal.
The statement of the EU Commissioner for Competition, Margrethe Vestager, concerning this matter is also remarkable. Vestager stated that they have investigated the claim that the above-mentioned automakers are violating the competition laws with respect to the development of emission-reducing technologies used in gasoline and diesel vehicles. Vestager qualified this claim as an infringement of the competition law that prevents consumers from purchasing lower pollutant-emitting vehicles, despite what is technologically available.[5] Therefore, an interesting investigation concerning the unusual claim that the competition laws are being violated by preventing technological development and restricting the competition between the competitors was birthed.
The EU Commission is also investigating the claim that BMW, Daimler, Volkswagen, Audi and Porsche, which are commonly referred as the “Circle of Five,” are exchanging information with respect to clean vehicle technologies through various meetings held amongst them. The EU Commission is specially concentrating on two emission systems used in the European Union. Whilst the SCR (Selective Catalytic Reduction) system is used to decrease harmful nitrogen oxide oscillation in diesel passenger vehicles, the system called OPF (Otto Particulate Filters) decreases the harmful particles’ oscillation in gasoline passenger vehicles.
If the BMW, Daimler and VW groups have formed an agreement to restrict technical development, this will be in violation of Article 101 of the Lisbon Treaty, through an agreement or a concerted action. In the relevant announcement of the EU Commission, it is also stated that at this stage, there is no clear evidence that these manufacturers used deceptive tools to mislead exhaust emissions tests, or that there was a consensus to this end amongst the said automakers. However, this is undoubtedly one of the first issues to be examined in the investigation phase.
Whilst the EU Commission"s main claim in the scope of the investigation concerns emission control systems, it is alleged that the automakers are also exchanging information on other matters, as well. For example, it is claimed that the mentioned undertakings are exchanging information on technical matters, such as common technical standards on automotive spare parts, as well as procedures for vehicle tests. In addition, it is known that the mentioned enterprises held various meetings on technical issues, such as sun roof and cruise control systems. It is also claimed that the Federal German automakers expanded their coordination to areas related to vehicle safety, such as crash tests, and shared their knowledge and experience in this area in a common pool.
Conclusion
The Diesel Emission Scandal, which started in 2015, radically changed the future plans of the relevant market’s players, particularly the German Automakers, eespecially with respect to the developments in the USA and Germany, which are quite remarkable. In the USA, the settlement negotiations, on behalf of millions of consumers, continue[6]. Recently, this issue is more current, in Germany. For example, the Braunschweig Prosecutor"s Office levied an administrative fine on the VW Group of EUR 1 billion[7]. VW announced that it would not object to this penalty, and accepted its responsibility. The Prosecutor"s Office stated that between 2007 and 2015, approximately 10.7 million vehicles, worldwide, have installed software that manipulates emission rates. In addition, the price paid by the VW Group for the Diesel Emission Scandal reached EUR 25.5 billion. In addition to the compensation paid to the consumers, this amount includes the administrative fines that were paid.
In May, 2018, Hamburg was the first major city that introduced restrictions on the entry of diesel vehicles into the city[8]. Diesel vehicles were banned, and warning signs were placed in various parts throughout Hamburg[9]. In April, 2019, the Diesel Ban will enter into force in Cologne and Bonn[10]. It was decided to apply various bans on diesel vehicles in other cities, such as Berlin, Frankfurt, Gelsenkirchen, Essen, Mainz and Stuttgart[11]. In short, the Diesel Emission Scandal is rapidly growing and deepening.
The EU Commission"s investigation on the Diesel Emission Scandal is a challenging process, as it will have to distinguish the negotiations between the automakers on technical issues, from information exchange, which is an infringement of competition law. Although the rules of competition law allow cooperation between enterprises for the purpose of technical development, this does not include infringements of competition law. The EU Commission will have to examine a very interesting claim of an infringement of competition law on the basis of the investigation, particularly, the restriction of competition through the prevention of technical development. Thus, this will be the precursor of new developments in competition law.
[1] See also for detailed information, https://www.bbc.com/turkce/ekonomi/2015/09/150922_volkswagen_emisyon (Access date: 28.11.2018).
[2] See also for detailed information, (Access date: 7.12.2018).
[3] http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-5822_en.htm (Access date: 7.12.2018).
[4] http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_STATEMENT-17-4084_en.htm (Access date: 7.12.2018).
[5] See also for detailed information. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-5822_en.htm (Access date: 7.12.2018).
[7] https://www.morgenpost.de/wirtschaft/article214571605/VW-muss-in-der-Dieselaffaere-eine-Milliarde-Bussgeld-zahlen.html (Access date: 10.12.2018).
[8] https://www.zeit.de/mobilitaet/2018-05/diesel-fahrverbote-hamburg-stickstoffbelastung (Access date: 10.12.2018).
[9] http://www.spiegel.de/auto/aktuell/diesel-fahrverbote-in-hamburg-ab-31-mai-a-1209050.html (Access date: 10.12.2018).
[10] https://www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/diesel-affaere/diesel-fahrverbote-in-koeln-und-bonn-von-april-2019-an-15880711.html (Access date: 10.12.2018).
[11] https://www.adac.de/rund-ums-fahrzeug/abgas-diesel-fahrverbote/fahrverbote/dieselfahrverbot-faq/ (Access date: 10.12.2019).
All rights of this article are reserved. This article may not be used, reproduced, copied, published, distributed, or otherwise disseminated without quotation or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm's written consent. Any content created without citing the resource or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm’s written consent is regularly tracked, and legal action will be taken in case of violation.
Other Contents
![A Recent CAS Decision in the Scope of European Union Competition Law: FIFA vs. Agents](/uploads/image/f1beda5b583bec23c78ecc0675a1801c-1697485091951.jpg)
At the meeting of the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (“FIFA”) held on 16 December 2022, the FIFA Council approved the FIFA Football Agents Regulations (“FFAR”). In the FFAR, various amendments have been made, such as the introduction of a maximum service fee limit that football agents are...
![CJEU Judgment in Super Bock: New Insight on Resale Price Maintenance](/uploads/image/54a2b0c5ed945898c5b3e0cbbdbec3db-1692112491415.jpg)
Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) is still considered a hardcore restriction under the recently revised Vertical Block Exemption Regulation (VBER), which means that it cannot benefit from a statutory exemption under Article 101(1) TFEU, unlike certain other types of vertical agreements. However, it has been debated...
![The Relationship Between Economic Entity and Family Ties in Light of Competition Board Decisions](/uploads/image/987f93713740414b5d800046f7ae90f4-1692112491275.jpg)
In competition law, it is important to accurately determine the concept of undertaking, especially in terms of mergers and acquisitions. Therefore, the concept of economic entity aims to reveal the economic units covered by the undertakings. The relationship between the concept of economic entity and family ties comes...
![A New Breath of Fresh Air for Competition Investigations from the Constitutional Court](/uploads/image/457d38ce076c07bc0fc68cc530b38e24-1689665818765.jpg)
In these days when the Competition Board (“Board”) frequently imposes administrative fines for preventing on-site inspections and both the Competition Authority (“Authority”) and undertakings take legal and technical measures regarding on-site inspections, a striking development has occurred. In its decision...
![Competition Law Practices in the Online Advertising Market](/uploads/image/16defa5a449eb0cd2c93e249ee79cabe-1689602198882.jpg)
Online advertising has become an important source for businesses for promoting products and services and meeting consumers, as a result of the rapid development of information technologies and increase in the use of internet. Delivering targeted messages to consumers at the right time through the digital...
![Selective Distribution Systems](/uploads/image/40c065a38c50c79456939162028b507f-1686901907313.jpg)
Selective distribution systems refer to a type of distribution system in which suppliers commit to selling the contracted goods or services directly or indirectly to distributors selected based on specified criteria, while the distributors commit not to sell the said goods or services to unauthorized...
![Final Sector Inquiry Report of the Competition Authority Regarding Fast-Moving Consumer Goods Retailing](/uploads/image/e398a32304c8b035f6e80e907c891035-1683714956697.jpg)
Fast-moving consumer goods is undoubtedly one of the sectors that the Competition Authority has been working most intensively since the COVID 19 pandemic. Among the most important developments of this period was the Sector Inquiry initiated on Fast Moving Consumer Goods (“FMCG”) Retailing...
![Constitutional Court's Evaluation of the Competition Board's Authority to Conduct On-Site Investigations](/uploads/image/355fca22c39dfecde98affc3a5bde22d-1683706521291.jpg)
In the decision of the Constitutional Court ("Constitutional Court" or "Court") dated 09.11.2022, numbered 2020/67 E. 2022/139 K. (the "Decision"), the annulment of certain articles of the Law Amending the Law on the Protection of Competition No. 4054 ("Law No. 7246") was requested...
![Gun Jumping in Turkish Competition Law](/uploads/image/bd304f6d558cb735ca3b04c0c5b76633-1681809291366.jpg)
In Turkish competition law, certain types of mergers and acquisitions are subject to Turkish Competition Board’s (“Board”) approval in order to gain legal validity. Pursuant to Article 7 of the Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”), the Board is competent to define mergers and acquisitions...
![The Problem of Returning the Data Obtained as a Result of Unlawful Notification in Light of the Competition Board Decision](/uploads/image/657ec47c7fb09bf6c288d0372c769769-1678882162423.jpg)
Recently, the Competition Board (the Board) had imposed administrative fines on banks and financial institutions for failing to respond to the request for information within the scope of a preliminary investigation.[i] The request for information that lays the groundwork for the administrative fine imposed by...
![The European Commission Accepts Amazon’s Commitments](/uploads/image/797769643f6a71619185b329eefb0310-1676443706355.jpg)
Amazon, a world-famous company, is an e-commerce company that operates the world’s largest online shopping platform. In the backstage, Amazon is a data-driven company whose retail decisions are mostly driven by automated systems, fueled by the relevant market data. That being said, Amazon has a dual...
![Deletion of WhatsApp Correspondence During On-Site Inspections](/uploads/image/0483ec90c238d23d478db6c66e3c1161-1668606630321.jpg)
The right to make on-site inspections is one of the Competition Board’s (“Board”) most important tools for revealing whether Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”) has been violated. The effective use of this authority is quite important in terms of obtaining fruitful results from...
![Amendment on the Regulation of Electronic Commerce: “The Fire of Mount Doom”](/uploads/image/3b6d487d7dd59c899c0dfa2b94efd480-1665496185815.jpg)
“Harese” is an interesting Arabic word. There is a thorn that camels love very much in the desert. The camel eats the thorn with great greed. So much so that, its mouth bleeds as it eats, but it doesn't stop eating. The taste of the thorn is mixed with the salty taste of its own blood. This mixed taste drives the camel...
![Turkish Competition Board Fines Digiturk](/uploads/image/d719242373d2bf57dae799e900779167-1665404138276.jpg)
Turkey’s leading pay television service provider, Krea İçerik Hizmetleri ve Prodüksiyon A.Ş. (“Digiturk”), is frequently the subject of complaints made to the Competition Authority (“Authority”). In fact, the Competition Board (“Board”) issues a new decision about Digiturk almost every year. In these decisions...
![The French Competition Authority’s Decision on Meta’s Commitments](/uploads/image/2eee208912d96d0d96626d7ae80ffea3-1660029056966.png)
The French Competition Authority (Autorité de la Concurrence), within the scope of the competition law proceeding initiated upon the complaint of Criteo SA (“Criteo”), accepted the commitments proposed by Meta Platforms Inc., Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd., and Facebook France...
![A Different Approach to Monetary Fines for Hindering On-Site Inspection: The Decision of the Ankara II. Administrative Court](/uploads/image/a98421fcee6aa2a5e925d44a0b84cf87-1659968918023.png)
While the scope of Competition Board’s (“Board”) power to conduct on-site inspections has increased with the introduction of Guidelines on Examination of Digital Data during On-site Inspections (“Guidelines”), nowadays the amount of monetary fines imposed on undertakings continue to...
![Hub and Spoke Cartel in Comparative Law](/uploads/image/aa6dd1691af57428f240bc2a5d9a4f90-1654155642720.png)
The hub and spoke cartel, which is a relatively new type of violation in terms of Turkish competition law, is defined as the indirect exchange of information between two independent undertakings which are horizontal competitors on the supplier or retailer level, through another undertaking...
![The First Settlement Case in Turkish Competition Law](/uploads/image/fe283612a4484947e912e5bfd72956e0-1653035448465.png)
The settlement mechanism has only recently been introduced to Turkish competition law practice. It entered into force with the amendment made to the Law on the Protection of Competition (“Law”) numbered 4054 on 16.06.2020, and has been in effect for less than two years. In this relatively...
![The E-Marketplace Platforms Sector Inquiry Final Report and What It Brings](/uploads/image/577e06d1b478c470981bb3dbd27bc045-1653035292554.png)
Due to their increasing share in the economy and rapid growth rate, e-marketplace platforms have come under the increasing scrutiny of the Turkish Competition Authority (“Authority”) as well as many competition authorities around the world...
![Amendments Introduced to the Communique Concerning the Mergers and Acquisitions Requiring Competition Board’s Approval](/uploads/image/87f9778bab40d8a5ec447d19c65192a1-1650281621031.png)
Pursuant to the Amendment Communiqué Concerning the Mergers and Acquisitions Requiring the Competition Board’s Approval (“Amending Communiqué”) published in the Official Gazette dated March 4th, 2022 and numbered 31768, certain amendments have been introduced...
![A New Glance at Online Sales: The Competition Board’s BSH Decision](/uploads/image/eb028542829926b42154271318afee33-1650280121193.png)
The Competition Board (“Board”) has recently published a reasoned decision in which it evaluated BSH Ev Aletleri Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş.’s (“BSH”) request for negative clearance or exemption with regard to its practice of prohibiting authorized dealers from making sales through online marketplaces...
![E-Marketplace Platforms Industry Review Preliminary Report Part 2: “Shahmaran’s Story”](/uploads/image/c7a2d8f5f419d6c02fbb481efce03b82-1647600809890.png)
Shahmaran, a Mesopotamian myth, is believed to take place in Tarsus. According to the myth, the shah of snakes is the immortal and omniscient "Shahmaran." Shahmaran is described as a beautiful woman living in her cave with her snakes...
![Online Sales Within The Framework Of Competition Law](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![The Effects of the Recent Decision by the Turkish Competition Board on Market Chains and Their Suppliers](/uploads/image/20a6d9de3b5f225f06bb4d2d6b550a63-1645780966884.png)
During the COVID-19 pandemic, competitive concerns about the pricing behavior of chain markets, manufacturers, and wholesalers engaged in the retail trade of food and cleaning supplies led to an investigation by...
![On-Site Inspections in Light of the Recent Decisions of the Competition Authority](/uploads/image/a4f0c2493452f7717602e5859922fe24-1642354214323.png)
When the past decisions and the recent decisions of the Competition Board (“Board”) are examined, a significant increase can be observed in the number of decisions where the Board found hindrance or obstruction of on-site inspections. This situation shows that...
![The European Commission Fines Banks for Participating in a Forex Cartel](/uploads/image/6c6c6c505e2aa1b6e37bed338b86fccc-1642354571098.png)
The European Commission began investigating the collusive behavior of Credit Suisse, UBS, Barclays, RBS, and HSBC in the Foreign Exchange (forex) spot trading market in 2019. With the recent press release dated 02.12.2021, the Commission announced that the case is now closed...
![Hub and Spoke Cartels](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![E-Marketplace Platforms Industry Review Preliminary Report Part 1: “Captain, an object is approaching”](/uploads/image/7f6304ae875a40b31fe8f26300dd1386-1647592331907.png)
Digitalization, in particular, necessitates the rewriting of competition law rules. Competition law is at the center all questions regarding e-commerce and digital platforms. The aforementioned platforms, which have become prominent due to innovations in...
![Interim Injunctions Under Competition Law: The Turkish Competition Board’s Retailers, WhatsApp and Trendyol Decisions](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Coca Cola’s Commitments in the Recent Competition Investigation](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Settlement Regulation Enters into Force](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Competition Law Concerns Regarding Human Resources Practices](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Competition Board Fine of Banks and Financial Institutions for Not Providing Information and Documents](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![The Commitment Mechanism in Competition Law Investigations in Turkey and the European Union](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Competition Board’s Guideline on the Examination of Digital Data during On-Site Inspections](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![The New Cartel Decision of the Competition Board](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Amendments in the Law on the Protection of Competition](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Setting Legal Grounds for On-site Inspections](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Evaluation of COVID 19 Outbreak in Terms of Turkish Competition Law](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Compliance Obligations with International Laws and Competition Board’s Data Access Requests](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Addressing the Finalization of the Competition Board Decisions as Preliminary Issue in Compensation Lawsuits](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![The File of Sahibinden.com; A Phoenix Story](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Standard of Proof in Cartel Allegations in Light of Turkish Competition Board’s Egg Producers Decision](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Final and Interim Decisions of the Turkish Competition Board](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Obtaining and Examining WhatsApp Correspondences as Evidence within the Scope of Competition Law](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Second Stage in Facebook File](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![European Commission’s Foreign Exchange Spot Trading Cartel Decisions](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Expected Second Half of Competition Authority’s 12 Banks Decision](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Restriction of Online Advertisement and Sales: European Commission’s Guess Decision](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Turkish Competition Board’s Sahibinden.com Decision](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Recent Developments in Abuse of Dominance Concerning Online Platforms](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Following the Commission’s Decision, the Turkish Competition Board also Fined Google](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![General Evaluation Regarding the Decisions of the Competition Board in the Electricity Distribution Sector](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Recent Developments in the Right of Access to Files](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Cards are being redistributed in the Turkish Beer Market](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![The Recent Motor Vehicles Insurance Decision of the Competition Board](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Draft Guideline on Vertical Agreements and the Related Workshop of the Competition Authority](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Selective Distribution Systems under the Light of Coty Decision](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Non-Competition Clauses for Employees: Limitation of Non-competition Clauses In Terms of Place, Time, Subject and Restriction Authority of the Judge](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Competition Authority’s Sector Inquiry Report on Television Broadcasting](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![The Turkish Competition Board Decides About the Scope of Legal Professional Privilege](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Excessive Pricing](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Amazon Decision and E-Book Commitments](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Block Exemption Communiqué on Vertical Agreements and Concerted Practices in the Motor Vehicle Sector](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![European Commission Approves Microsoft’s Acquisition of LinkedIn Subject to Conditions](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Competition Board’s Recent Examinations in the Electricity Sector: Back to the Past](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Umbrella Effect within the Framework of Private Competition Enforcement](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Passing-On Defense and Indirect Purchaser Rule in Compensation Claims Arising from Competition Law](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Tüpraş Decision and the Rebate Systems](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Important Reason in Terms Of Share Transfer Restrictions](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Booking.com Decision](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Price / Margin Squeeze](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Recent Problems in Electricity Distribution Sector: ELDER Decision](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Intellectual Property Rights As Capital in Kind](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Right To Request Information Of The Shareholders in Joint Stock Companies](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Affected Market](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)
![Germany’s Federal Cartel Office Prohibits Facebook from Combining User Data from Different Sources](/assets/image/hukuk-postasi-default.jpg)