Amendment on the Regulation of Electronic Commerce: “The Fire of Mount Doom”

30.09.2022 Mert Karamustafaoğlu

To become spring, means accepting the risk of winter.

To become presence, means accepting the risk of absence.

The Little Prince, Antoine de Saint-Exupéry


Introduction

“Harese” is an interesting Arabic word. There is a thorn that camels love very much in the desert. The camel eats the thorn with great greed. So much so that, its mouth bleeds as it eats, but it doesn't stop eating. The taste of the thorn is mixed with the salty taste of its own blood. This mixed taste drives the camel to distraction. The more it bleeds, the more it eats. In the end, the camel dies from the loss of blood. It is said that the word for this thorn, “harese,” is where the Arabic word for "Greed" stems from.

Greed also appears in the story of the creation of the rings of power in J.R.R. Tolkien's legendary work, The Lord of the Rings. Just like the taste of his own blood that consumes the camel, greed is the main element of Sauron's plan to enslave the people of Middle-earth. Sauron, who easily obtains the people of Middle-earth with the rings of power, actually destroys them by using their greed. There is only one ring that controls them all and it has one lord, Sauron. Like the fire of Mount Doom from which it was made, that single ring burns its lord with the greed.

The last three years of our lives were passed under the influence of a pandemic. In this process, we have lost a lot of things that we were used to and that we loved. But we have also gained new habits. Every change has brought us something new. The e-commerce area, which has been expected to develop for years, has grown greedily. Turkey has also had its share of this growth. A significant portion of the six unicorn companies that have emerged in Turkey in recent years are e-commerce companies.

This rapid development called for radical amendments to Law No. 6563 on the Regulation of Electronic Commerce ("E-commerce Law") adopted in 2014. These long-awaited amendments finally came with the Law Numbered 7416 Regarding the Amendment to the Law on Regulation of Electronic Commerce[1] ("Amendment"). This Amendment, which is revolutionary in every respect, is actually a salute to competition law practices that have been ongoing for a while in the field of e-commerce.

Amendment on the Regulation of Electronic Commerce: “The Fire of Mount Doom”
% 0

The E-Marketplace Platforms Sector Inquiry

The Turkish Competition Authority (“The Competition Authority”) turned its attention to e-commerce developments during the COVID-19 period. The most important of these was the E-Marketplace Platforms Sector Inquiry. A comprehensive report ("Report") was published in this inquiry.[2]

The Report was a frame breaking inquiry of the subject. In particular, data collection activities of platforms such as e-marketplaces, the important role they play for access to market and hence their market power were a harbinger of a change for the future. Above all, the radical recommendations and conclusions of the Report, which call for serious regulatory amendments, were noteworthy. Importantly, the Report stated that the problems could not be solved only by competition rules and suggested that new regulations should also be made.

The report expressed some competitive concerns. For instance, the risk of discrimination among sellers and arbitrary practices regarding product and seller ranking on platforms were among the most significant of these. In particular, the data collected by platforms and the concerns that this causes was perhaps among the most important findings of the Report. The finding that some practices of e-marketplaces based on market power were deemed to be unfair commercial practices and that this has a negative impact on intra-platform competition was also remarkable. The most notable of these was undoubtedly the data-driven competition law concerns, which began with the German Federal Cartel Office's Facebook case and continued with the European Union Commission's investigations into Apple and Amazon. In the Report, the Competition Authority also made very clear findings on this new type of data-driven competition violations.

The last finding in the Report is the discrimination risk related to hybrid marketplaces, i.e. marketplaces that both operate as platforms and that sell products. Accordingly, these hybrid marketplaces could favor themselves and exclude competing sellers. Examples of these practices include giving priority to one's own products in listings and rankings, using seller data to gain an unfair advantage in the products that one sells, and providing unfair advantages to sellers who benefit from the marketplace’s associated services compared to other sellers. In order to eliminate this information asymmetry, the report recommends that "listing, ranking and related service utilization" conditions be determined "objectively" and that they be shared with sellers in "clear", "understandable" language, and in a "transparent" and "easily accessible" way. It also warned that marketplaces, as gatekeepers, should not create barriers to consumers' and sellers' access to their data and its transfer to other platforms. The expansion of e-marketplaces' activities into related markets is similarly seen as problematic. In case marketplaces access related markets such as cargo/logistics and payment systems, this may raise competition concerns for both sellers and undertakings in these markets.

An Amendment Blown in by Competition Law Winds

The Amendment deeply affects the E-Commerce Law that entered in force in 2014. In fact, the Amendment bears significant traces of competition law in terms of both the draft law and the preambles of its articles. Surprisingly, the traces of the Report are seen both in the general preamble and in the article preambles of the draft. It should be emphasized that most of the undertakings using e-marketplaces are micro and small enterprises, and that they lack bargaining power against e-marketplaces. For this reason, the Amendment states that e-marketplace companies often engage in unfair and unequal practices such as imposing unilateral contractual provisions, highlighting their own goods or services, complicating or disallowing data portability, forcing the supply of goods or services, making late payments, forcing provide promotional goods or services, receiving a fee despite not providing any service, downgrading electronic commerce service providers in the ranking or recommendation system, restricting, suspending or terminating the services offered.

Saturations in the relevant market are also highlighted. E-marketplaces that grow with aggressive growth strategies further strengthen their market position due to economies of scale and network effects. The Amendment also states that this is an entry barrier for the market. More importantly, data-related concerns are also included in the general preamble. It states that the data collected through e-marketplaces are used by these undertakings and gives them a voice in areas such as logistics and payment systems. This situation enhances both consumer dependency and concentration in the market. In the medium and long term, this leads to monopolization, higher prices, a decrease in quality and product diversity, and the elimination of innovation.

In conclusion, the Amendment also makes a reference to the state's objective of the prevention of cartelization, as regulated in Article 167 of the Constitution. It emphasizes the importance of the effective functioning of markets in terms of ensuring social welfare. Highlighting the risk of monopolization of e-commerce, which is an important commercial channel, it states the need to regulate this issue for the public interest.  It also points out that e-marketplaces have become determinant in areas such as finance, logistics and information-communication within the e-commerce ecosystem due to this monopolization and the potential risks of this situation in terms of the economic, social and democratic social order.

Some of the rules created by the Amendment are in line with competition law concerns in this sense. For instance, the Amendment prohibits e-commerce intermediary service providers from offering for sale or intermediating the sale of goods bearing their own trademarks or trademark usage rights in e-commerce marketplaces where they provide intermediary services. This new rule aims to prevent e-commerce intermediary service providers from abusing their market power. Similarly, it also aims to prevent e-commerce intermediary service providers from using the data obtained from the undertakings to which they provide intermediary services so as to gain an advantage when competing with these undertakings.

Another amended obligation imposed on e-commerce intermediary service providers with an annual net transaction volume of more than ten billion Turkish Liras (“TRY”) is to allow sellers using these platforms to transfer their data to other platforms. Another obligation imposed on e-commerce intermediary service providers with an annual net transaction volume of thirty billion TRY is to prevent them from forcing anyone to purchase goods or services from any person, including services such as cargo provided by them. Another obligation imposed on e-commerce intermediary service providers with an annual net transaction volume of sixty billion TRY is to prevent them from transferring their market power to financial services, cargo and logistics services. 

Conclusion

The E-commerce area is undoubtedly one of the most dynamic sectors in terms of competition law. The Competition Authority, which revealed its competitive concerns in the Report, seems to have paved the way for many changes. The first of these came with an amendment that has made waves in this sector. Time will tell what its effects will be, but the Amendment aims to prevent many of the issues that have been raised in the rapidly and even greedily growing e-commerce area. As stated in the draft, these issues are related to the risks that the market power of e-marketplaces contains risks in terms of economic, social and democratic social order. Thus, the Competition Authority drew attention to a significant part of these risks with the Report published after a long study. The e-commerce sector, which was once identified with innovation, technological development and even the variety of products offered to the consumer, is now on the agenda due to its negative aspects. In particular, e-marketplaces, like many platform economies are being seriously examined due to their market power. Just like the rings of power, e-marketplaces are being tested by the fire of Mount Doom. In fact,

“to become spring, means accepting the risk of winter.”

References

All rights of this article are reserved. This article may not be used, reproduced, copied, published, distributed, or otherwise disseminated without quotation or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm's written consent. Any content created without citing the resource or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm’s written consent is regularly tracked, and legal action will be taken in case of violation.

Other Contents

A Recent CAS Decision in the Scope of European Union Competition Law: FIFA vs. Agents
Newsletter Articles
A Recent CAS Decision in the Scope of European Union Competition Law: FIFA vs. Agents

At the meeting of the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (“FIFA”) held on 16 December 2022, the FIFA Council approved the FIFA Football Agents Regulations (“FFAR”). In the FFAR, various amendments have been made, such as the introduction of a maximum service fee limit that football agents are...

Competition Law 30.09.2023
CJEU Judgment in Super Bock: New Insight on Resale Price Maintenance
Newsletter Articles
CJEU Judgment in Super Bock: New Insight on Resale Price Maintenance

Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) is still considered a hardcore restriction under the recently revised Vertical Block Exemption Regulation (VBER), which means that it cannot benefit from a statutory exemption under Article 101(1) TFEU, unlike certain other types of vertical agreements. However, it has been debated...

Competition Law 31.07.2023
The Relationship Between Economic Entity and Family Ties in Light of Competition Board Decisions
Newsletter Articles
The Relationship Between Economic Entity and Family Ties in Light of Competition Board Decisions

In competition law, it is important to accurately determine the concept of undertaking, especially in terms of mergers and acquisitions. Therefore, the concept of economic entity aims to reveal the economic units covered by the undertakings. The relationship between the concept of economic entity and family ties comes...

Competition Law 31.07.2023
A New Breath of Fresh Air for Competition Investigations from the Constitutional Court
Newsletter Articles
A New Breath of Fresh Air for Competition Investigations from the Constitutional Court

In these days when the Competition Board (“Board”) frequently imposes administrative fines for preventing on-site inspections and both the Competition Authority (“Authority”) and undertakings take legal and technical measures regarding on-site inspections, a striking development has occurred. In its decision...

Competition Law 30.06.2023
Competition Law Practices in the Online Advertising Market
Newsletter Articles
Competition Law Practices in the Online Advertising Market

Online advertising has become an important source for businesses for promoting products and services and meeting consumers, as a result of the rapid development of information technologies and increase in the use of internet. Delivering targeted messages to consumers at the right time through the digital...

Competition Law 30.06.2023
Selective Distribution Systems
Newsletter Articles
Selective Distribution Systems

Selective distribution systems refer to a type of distribution system in which suppliers commit to selling the contracted goods or services directly or indirectly to distributors selected based on specified criteria, while the distributors commit not to sell the said goods or services to unauthorized...

Competition Law 31.05.2023
Final Sector Inquiry Report of the Competition Authority Regarding Fast-Moving Consumer Goods Retailing
Newsletter Articles
Final Sector Inquiry Report of the Competition Authority Regarding Fast-Moving Consumer Goods Retailing

Fast-moving consumer goods is undoubtedly one of the sectors that the Competition Authority has been working most intensively since the COVID 19 pandemic. Among the most important developments of this period was the Sector Inquiry initiated on Fast Moving Consumer Goods (“FMCG”) Retailing...

Competition Law 30.04.2023
Constitutional Court's Evaluation of the Competition Board's Authority to Conduct On-Site Investigations
Newsletter Articles
Constitutional Court's Evaluation of the Competition Board's Authority to Conduct On-Site Investigations

In the decision of the Constitutional Court ("Constitutional Court" or "Court") dated 09.11.2022, numbered 2020/67 E. 2022/139 K. (the "Decision"), the annulment of certain articles of the Law Amending the Law on the Protection of Competition No. 4054 ("Law No. 7246") was requested...

Competition Law 30.04.2023
Gun Jumping in Turkish Competition Law
Newsletter Articles
Gun Jumping in Turkish Competition Law

In Turkish competition law, certain types of mergers and acquisitions are subject to Turkish Competition Board’s (“Board”) approval in order to gain legal validity. Pursuant to Article 7 of the Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”), the Board is competent to define mergers and acquisitions...

Competition Law 31.03.2023
The Problem of Returning the Data Obtained as a Result of Unlawful Notification in Light of the Competition Board Decision
Newsletter Articles
The Problem of Returning the Data Obtained as a Result of Unlawful Notification in Light of the Competition Board Decision

Recently, the Competition Board (the Board) had imposed administrative fines on banks and financial institutions for failing to respond to the request for information within the scope of a preliminary investigation.[i] The request for information that lays the groundwork for the administrative fine imposed by...

Competition Law 28.02.2023
The European Commission Accepts Amazon’s Commitments
Newsletter Articles
The European Commission Accepts Amazon’s Commitments

Amazon, a world-famous company, is an e-commerce company that operates the world’s largest online shopping platform. In the backstage, Amazon is a data-driven company whose retail decisions are mostly driven by automated systems, fueled by the relevant market data. That being said, Amazon has a dual...

Competition Law 31.01.2023
Deletion of WhatsApp Correspondence During On-Site Inspections
Newsletter Articles
Deletion of WhatsApp Correspondence During On-Site Inspections

The right to make on-site inspections is one of the Competition Board’s (“Board”) most important tools for revealing whether Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”) has been violated. The effective use of this authority is quite important in terms of obtaining fruitful results from...

Competition Law 31.10.2022
Turkish Competition Board Fines Digiturk
Newsletter Articles
Turkish Competition Board Fines Digiturk

Turkey’s leading pay television service provider, Krea İçerik Hizmetleri ve Prodüksiyon A.Ş. (“Digiturk”), is frequently the subject of complaints made to the Competition Authority (“Authority”). In fact, the Competition Board (“Board”) issues a new decision about Digiturk almost every year. In these decisions...

Competition Law 30.09.2022
The French Competition Authority’s Decision on Meta’s Commitments
Newsletter Articles
The French Competition Authority’s Decision on Meta’s Commitments

The French Competition Authority (Autorité de la Concurrence), within the scope of the competition law proceeding initiated upon the complaint of Criteo SA (“Criteo”), accepted the commitments proposed by Meta Platforms Inc., Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd., and Facebook France...

Competition Law 31.07.2022
A Different Approach to Monetary Fines for Hindering On-Site Inspection: The Decision of the Ankara II. Administrative Court
Newsletter Articles
A Different Approach to Monetary Fines for Hindering On-Site Inspection: The Decision of the Ankara II. Administrative Court

While the scope of Competition Board’s (“Board”) power to conduct on-site inspections has increased with the introduction of Guidelines on Examination of Digital Data during On-site Inspections (“Guidelines”), nowadays the amount of monetary fines imposed on undertakings continue to...

Competition Law 31.07.2022
Hub and Spoke Cartel in Comparative Law
Newsletter Articles
Hub and Spoke Cartel in Comparative Law

The hub and spoke cartel, which is a relatively new type of violation in terms of Turkish competition law, is defined as the indirect exchange of information between two independent undertakings which are horizontal competitors on the supplier or retailer level, through another undertaking...

Competition Law April 2022
The First Settlement Case in Turkish Competition Law
Newsletter Articles
The First Settlement Case in Turkish Competition Law

The settlement mechanism has only recently been introduced to Turkish competition law practice. It entered into force with the amendment made to the Law on the Protection of Competition (“Law”) numbered 4054 on 16.06.2020, and has been in effect for less than two years. In this relatively...

Competition Law April 2022
The E-Marketplace Platforms Sector Inquiry Final Report and What It Brings
Newsletter Articles
The E-Marketplace Platforms Sector Inquiry Final Report and What It Brings

Due to their increasing share in the economy and rapid growth rate, e-marketplace platforms have come under the increasing scrutiny of the Turkish Competition Authority (“Authority”) as well as many competition authorities around the world...

Competition Law April 2022
Amendments Introduced to the Communique Concerning the Mergers and Acquisitions Requiring Competition Board’s Approval
Newsletter Articles
Amendments Introduced to the Communique Concerning the Mergers and Acquisitions Requiring Competition Board’s Approval

Pursuant to the Amendment Communiqué Concerning the Mergers and Acquisitions Requiring the Competition Board’s Approval (“Amending Communiqué”) published in the Official Gazette dated March 4th, 2022 and numbered 31768, certain amendments have been introduced...

Competition Law March 2022
A New Glance at Online Sales: The Competition Board’s BSH Decision
Newsletter Articles
A New Glance at Online Sales: The Competition Board’s BSH Decision

The Competition Board (“Board”) has recently published a reasoned decision in which it evaluated BSH Ev Aletleri Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş.’s (“BSH”) request for negative clearance or exemption with regard to its practice of prohibiting authorized dealers from making sales through online marketplaces...

Competition Law March 2022
E-Marketplace Platforms Industry Review Preliminary Report Part 2: “Shahmaran’s Story”
Newsletter Articles
E-Marketplace Platforms Industry Review Preliminary Report Part 2: “Shahmaran’s Story”

Shahmaran, a Mesopotamian myth, is believed to take place in Tarsus. According to the myth, the shah of snakes is the immortal and omniscient "Shahmaran." Shahmaran is described as a beautiful woman living in her cave with her snakes...

Competition Law February 2022
Online Sales Within The Framework Of Competition Law
Newsletter Articles
The Effects of the Recent Decision by the Turkish Competition Board on Market Chains and Their Suppliers
Newsletter Articles
The Effects of the Recent Decision by the Turkish Competition Board on Market Chains and Their Suppliers

During the COVID-19 pandemic, competitive concerns about the pricing behavior of chain markets, manufacturers, and wholesalers engaged in the retail trade of food and cleaning supplies led to an investigation by...

Competition Law January 2022
On-Site Inspections in Light of the Recent Decisions of the Competition Authority
Newsletter Articles
On-Site Inspections in Light of the Recent Decisions of the Competition Authority

When the past decisions and the recent decisions of the Competition Board (“Board”) are examined, a significant increase can be observed in the number of decisions where the Board found hindrance or obstruction of on-site inspections. This situation shows that...

Competition Law December 2021
The European Commission Fines Banks for Participating in a Forex Cartel
Newsletter Articles
The European Commission Fines Banks for Participating in a Forex Cartel

The European Commission began investigating the collusive behavior of Credit Suisse, UBS, Barclays, RBS, and HSBC in the Foreign Exchange (forex) spot trading market in 2019. With the recent press release dated 02.12.2021, the Commission announced that the case is now closed...

Competition Law December 2021
Hub and Spoke Cartels
Newsletter Articles
Hub and Spoke Cartels
Competition Law November 2021
E-Marketplace Platforms Industry Review Preliminary Report Part 1: “Captain, an object is approaching”
Newsletter Articles
E-Marketplace Platforms Industry Review Preliminary Report Part 1: “Captain, an object is approaching”

Digitalization, in particular, necessitates the rewriting of competition law rules. Competition law is at the center all questions regarding e-commerce and digital platforms. The aforementioned platforms, which have become prominent due to innovations in...

Competition Law November 2021
Coca Cola’s Commitments in the Recent Competition Investigation
Newsletter Articles
Settlement Regulation Enters into Force
Newsletter Articles
Settlement Regulation Enters into Force
Competition Law July 2021
Competition Law Concerns Regarding Human Resources Practices
Newsletter Articles
The New Cartel Decision of the Competition Board
Newsletter Articles
The New Cartel Decision of the Competition Board
Competition Law September 2020
Amendments in the Law on the Protection of Competition
Newsletter Articles
Setting Legal Grounds for On-site Inspections
Newsletter Articles
Evaluation of COVID 19 Outbreak in Terms of Turkish Competition Law
Newsletter Articles
The File of Sahibinden.com; A Phoenix Story
Newsletter Articles
The File of Sahibinden.com; A Phoenix Story
Competition Law February 2020
Final and Interim Decisions of the Turkish Competition Board
Newsletter Articles
Second Stage in Facebook File
Newsletter Articles
Second Stage in Facebook File
Competition Law September 2019
European Commission’s Foreign Exchange Spot Trading Cartel Decisions
Newsletter Articles
Expected Second Half of Competition Authority’s 12 Banks Decision
Newsletter Articles
Turkish Competition Board’s Sahibinden.com Decision
Newsletter Articles
Recent Developments in Abuse of Dominance Concerning Online Platforms
Newsletter Articles
New Horizons in Competition Law; Diesel Emissions Scandal
Newsletter Articles
Recent Developments in the Right of Access to Files
Newsletter Articles
Cards are being redistributed in the Turkish Beer Market
Newsletter Articles
The Recent Motor Vehicles Insurance Decision of the Competition Board
Newsletter Articles
Selective Distribution Systems under the Light of Coty Decision
Newsletter Articles
Competition Authority’s Sector Inquiry Report on Television Broadcasting
Newsletter Articles
Excessive Pricing
Newsletter Articles
Excessive Pricing
Competition Law June 2017
Amazon Decision and E-Book Commitments
Newsletter Articles
Amazon Decision and E-Book Commitments
Competition Law June 2017
Umbrella Effect within the Framework of Private Competition Enforcement
Newsletter Articles
Tüpraş Decision and the Rebate Systems
Newsletter Articles
Tüpraş Decision and the Rebate Systems
Competition Law September 2016
Important Reason in Terms Of Share Transfer Restrictions
Newsletter Articles
Booking.com Decision
Newsletter Articles
Booking.com Decision
Competition Law January 2017
Price / Margin Squeeze
Newsletter Articles
Price / Margin Squeeze
Competition Law November 2016
Recent Problems in Electricity Distribution Sector: ELDER Decision
Newsletter Articles
Intellectual Property Rights As Capital in Kind
Newsletter Articles
Right To Request Information Of The Shareholders in Joint Stock Companies
Newsletter Articles
Affected Market
Newsletter Articles
Affected Market
Competition Law August 2015

For creative legal solutions, please contact us.