Constitutional Court's Evaluation of the Competition Board's Authority to Conduct On-Site Investigations

30.04.2023 Merve Demirkaya

Introduction

In the decision of the Constitutional Court ("Constitutional Court" or "Court") dated 09.11.2022, numbered 2020/67 E. 2022/139 K. (the "Decision"), the annulment of certain articles of the Law Amending the Law on the Protection of Competition No. 4054 ("Law No. 7246") was requested.

These articles are Article 3 of the Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition ("Law No. 4054") regarding structural measures, Article 4 regarding the authority of the Competition Board ("Board") to conduct on-site examinations and Article 12 regarding the status of the personnel of the Competition Authority ("Authority"). In the Decision, only the part of Law No. 4054 regarding the appointment of the Authority's personnel as research assistants was annulled and the other provisions did not need to be annulled. In this article, the part of Article 15 of Law No. 4054 regarding the Board's authority to conduct on-site inspections is discussed together with the dissenting votes.

Constitutional Court's Evaluation of the Competition Board's Authority to Conduct On-Site Investigations
% 0

Background

One of the amendments made in Law No. 4054 by Law No. 7246, published in the Official Gazette numbered 31165 on 24.06.2020, is related to the on-site inspection authority of the Board. Under this amendment, it has been regulated that the Authority's experts can examine the records, physical and electronic data, and documents of the enterprise or associations of undertakings, and can take copies and physical samples of them, and the practical application of the Authority which existed before the regulation has been put on a legal basis.

As the Constitutional Court stated in the judgment, as a result of the recent non-stop developments in information technologies, personal data is processed much more and faster than traditional methods. Accordingly, many data that were previously considered unrelated to each other are brought together centrally and the capacity to generate new data increases by subjecting the data to analysis with advanced technological means such as data mining, and personal data becomes a valuable asset for commercial enterprises. On the other hand, the sensitivity regarding the protection of personal data has increased as the attempts of terrorism and criminal organizations to obtain this processed data have also increased with the more widespread processing of data. Therefore, the Personal Data Protection Authority ("KVKK") has become more active in parallel with this sensitivity and continues to do so.

Due to the sensitivities mentioned above, the board authority granted by Law No. 7246 to Authority experts for on-site inspections has been a subject of much debate in terms of the protection of personal data. In this respect, it has been stated that the rule regulated in Article 15/1(a) of Law No. 4054, which allows the copying and sampling of all kinds of documents of undertakings without any limitation, and does not include any guarantee regarding the acquisition and processing of personal data, which also grants access to commercial secrets and customer data of undertakings without any requirement of the representative of the relevant undertaking being present during this process, and the legal certainty of the relevant rule is problematic.

Assessment of the Constitutional Court

During its evaluation of the provision regarding on-site inspections regulated by the Law No. 4054, the Constitutional Court underlines the importance that it attributes to the protection of personal data. First, the court states that personal data is guaranteed under the confidentiality of private life scope in Article 20 of the Constitution. Then, the Constitutional Court examines the scope of the provision and therefore the protection of personal data for individuals. The court notes that the phrase "everyone" is mentioned in Article 20 of the Constitution and therefore the data related to legal entities should also be evaluated within the scope of the article. However, the decision states that as well as real persons with civil rights, legal entities also have legal standing to apply individually.

The Constitutional Court's approach is quite important and remarkable. In fact, the European Data Protection Directive No. 95/46/EC dated February 20, 1995, which is the main law for the Personal Data Protection Law No. 6698 ("KVKK") dated March 24, 2016, excludes data related to legal entities. The court shows that this different approach is justified by the technological developments in recent years and the fact that legal entities are considered personal data owners in the electronic communication sector under the European Parliament and Council Directive No. 2002/58/EC of July 12, 2002.

After determining that legal entities are also within the scope of personal data protection, the Constitutional Court accepts that the provision requested to be cancelled imposes a restriction, and evaluates the conformity of the provision with the Constitution.

Legality Assessment

After referring to Article 20 of the Constitution and stating that personal data can only be processed in cases where the explicit consent of the relevant person is given and it is provided by law, the Constitutional Court states that the competence granted to the Board in the challenged provision is clear and precise in terms of subject, scope, and limitations and therefore complies with the principle of legality since it meets the criteria of clarity, accessibility, and predictability.

Proportionality Assessment

During the proportionality assessment, the Court firstly emphasizes the obligation imposed on the state by the second paragraph of Article 48 and Article 167 of the Constitution to ensure the functioning of free markets and prevent collusion and states that the relevant provision is aimed at a legitimate purpose. In this context, the court notes that healthy and regular functioning of markets is a mandatory requirement and, in some cases, it is difficult to find evidence without the challenged provision, and therefore, the necessity element of the provision is satisfied.

Moreover, it is accepted that the evidence to be obtained by the experts of the Authority will prevent market malfunctions, monopoly, and collusion. In addition to this point, the Constitutional Court states that due to technological developments and data storage methods, it is not possible to examine violations of competition on data such as corporate structures and market power, and therefore, the provision is suitable for this purpose.

Finally, the Court reviews the relevant provision in terms of proportionality and concludes that it is proportionate, taking into account (I) the fact that the review is carried out by submitting documents, (II) the fact that the Board does not have the power to use force, (III) the fact that issues for which the parties were not given the right to defend themselves cannot be relied upon, (III) the fact that the Board is subject to the obligations provided for in the KVKK, and (IV) the fact that special categories of personal data are subject to stricter conditions

Grounds for Dissenting Votes

The reasons for dissent can be grouped under two headings. The first is that the provision whose annulment is requested does not comply with the legality principle, and the second is that the relevant provision is contrary to Article 21 of the Constitution, which regulates the inviolability of the home.

Legality

In the dissenting opinions, it is argued that although the authority to obtain copies and physical samples of all kinds of data and documents has been regulated in the provision whose annulment is requested, the conditions required by Article 20 (3) of the Constitution for how these copies and physical samples obtained will be used, where they will be processed and stored, are not provided with the necessary guarantees, and it is not specified how this information and documents will be used, whether there is an opportunity to object to such information, and the period and procedure for their erasure are not provided, which undermines the certainty requirement of the legality principle and therefore contradicts the legality principle.

Immunity of Domicile

Another reason for dissent is the inviolability of the home. According to this view, places that are not entirely dedicated to work should be considered as part of the home, and decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Court supporting this view are cited.[1] Therefore, according to the relevant dissenting opinion, if workplaces are considered as part of the home, the express consent of the workplace owner is required for an inspection to be carried out. In cases where the workplace owner does not give express consent, a court order is required. According to the last paragraph of Article 15 of Law No. 4054, if the workplace owner does not allow an inspection, this is considered as obstruction of inspection and the relevant undertaking will face an administrative fine, so even if the undertaking owner consents to an inspection on site, this consent cannot be considered as express consent.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Constitutional Court accepts the Board's power to conduct on-site inspections as a proportional and lawful means of protecting competition. On the other hand, it is important to note that the Constitutional Court has stated that legal entities can also benefit from the protection provided in the KVKK and that the Board is subject to the obligations set forth in the KVKK. Although the Constitutional Court has taken a clear stance on this issue, the increasing sensitivity regarding personal data suggests that this debate on personal data and the Board's powers will continue.

References
  • Niemietz v. Germany, B. No. 13710/88, 16/12/1992, § 30; Société Colas Est c./France, B. No. 37971/97, 16 April 2002, §§ 40-42; Petri Sallinen and Others v. Finland, B. No. 50882/99, 27/12/2005, § 70, Mehmet Taşdemir, B. No. 2013/3436, 18/5/2016, § 55.

All rights of this article are reserved. This article may not be used, reproduced, copied, published, distributed, or otherwise disseminated without quotation or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm's written consent. Any content created without citing the resource or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm’s written consent is regularly tracked, and legal action will be taken in case of violation.

Other Contents

A Recent CAS Decision in the Scope of European Union Competition Law: FIFA vs. Agents
Newsletter Articles
A Recent CAS Decision in the Scope of European Union Competition Law: FIFA vs. Agents

At the meeting of the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (“FIFA”) held on 16 December 2022, the FIFA Council approved the FIFA Football Agents Regulations (“FFAR”). In the FFAR, various amendments have been made, such as the introduction of a maximum service fee limit that football agents are...

Competition Law 30.09.2023
CJEU Judgment in Super Bock: New Insight on Resale Price Maintenance
Newsletter Articles
CJEU Judgment in Super Bock: New Insight on Resale Price Maintenance

Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) is still considered a hardcore restriction under the recently revised Vertical Block Exemption Regulation (VBER), which means that it cannot benefit from a statutory exemption under Article 101(1) TFEU, unlike certain other types of vertical agreements. However, it has been debated...

Competition Law 31.07.2023
The Relationship Between Economic Entity and Family Ties in Light of Competition Board Decisions
Newsletter Articles
The Relationship Between Economic Entity and Family Ties in Light of Competition Board Decisions

In competition law, it is important to accurately determine the concept of undertaking, especially in terms of mergers and acquisitions. Therefore, the concept of economic entity aims to reveal the economic units covered by the undertakings. The relationship between the concept of economic entity and family ties comes...

Competition Law 31.07.2023
A New Breath of Fresh Air for Competition Investigations from the Constitutional Court
Newsletter Articles
A New Breath of Fresh Air for Competition Investigations from the Constitutional Court

In these days when the Competition Board (“Board”) frequently imposes administrative fines for preventing on-site inspections and both the Competition Authority (“Authority”) and undertakings take legal and technical measures regarding on-site inspections, a striking development has occurred. In its decision...

Competition Law 30.06.2023
Competition Law Practices in the Online Advertising Market
Newsletter Articles
Competition Law Practices in the Online Advertising Market

Online advertising has become an important source for businesses for promoting products and services and meeting consumers, as a result of the rapid development of information technologies and increase in the use of internet. Delivering targeted messages to consumers at the right time through the digital...

Competition Law 30.06.2023
Selective Distribution Systems
Newsletter Articles
Selective Distribution Systems

Selective distribution systems refer to a type of distribution system in which suppliers commit to selling the contracted goods or services directly or indirectly to distributors selected based on specified criteria, while the distributors commit not to sell the said goods or services to unauthorized...

Competition Law 31.05.2023
Final Sector Inquiry Report of the Competition Authority Regarding Fast-Moving Consumer Goods Retailing
Newsletter Articles
Final Sector Inquiry Report of the Competition Authority Regarding Fast-Moving Consumer Goods Retailing

Fast-moving consumer goods is undoubtedly one of the sectors that the Competition Authority has been working most intensively since the COVID 19 pandemic. Among the most important developments of this period was the Sector Inquiry initiated on Fast Moving Consumer Goods (“FMCG”) Retailing...

Competition Law 30.04.2023
Gun Jumping in Turkish Competition Law
Newsletter Articles
Gun Jumping in Turkish Competition Law

In Turkish competition law, certain types of mergers and acquisitions are subject to Turkish Competition Board’s (“Board”) approval in order to gain legal validity. Pursuant to Article 7 of the Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”), the Board is competent to define mergers and acquisitions...

Competition Law 31.03.2023
The Problem of Returning the Data Obtained as a Result of Unlawful Notification in Light of the Competition Board Decision
Newsletter Articles
The Problem of Returning the Data Obtained as a Result of Unlawful Notification in Light of the Competition Board Decision

Recently, the Competition Board (the Board) had imposed administrative fines on banks and financial institutions for failing to respond to the request for information within the scope of a preliminary investigation.[i] The request for information that lays the groundwork for the administrative fine imposed by...

Competition Law 28.02.2023
The European Commission Accepts Amazon’s Commitments
Newsletter Articles
The European Commission Accepts Amazon’s Commitments

Amazon, a world-famous company, is an e-commerce company that operates the world’s largest online shopping platform. In the backstage, Amazon is a data-driven company whose retail decisions are mostly driven by automated systems, fueled by the relevant market data. That being said, Amazon has a dual...

Competition Law 31.01.2023
Deletion of WhatsApp Correspondence During On-Site Inspections
Newsletter Articles
Deletion of WhatsApp Correspondence During On-Site Inspections

The right to make on-site inspections is one of the Competition Board’s (“Board”) most important tools for revealing whether Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”) has been violated. The effective use of this authority is quite important in terms of obtaining fruitful results from...

Competition Law 31.10.2022
Amendment on the Regulation of Electronic Commerce: “The Fire of Mount Doom”
Newsletter Articles
Amendment on the Regulation of Electronic Commerce: “The Fire of Mount Doom”

“Harese” is an interesting Arabic word. There is a thorn that camels love very much in the desert. The camel eats the thorn with great greed. So much so that, its mouth bleeds as it eats, but it doesn't stop eating. The taste of the thorn is mixed with the salty taste of its own blood. This mixed taste drives the camel...

Competition Law 30.09.2022
Turkish Competition Board Fines Digiturk
Newsletter Articles
Turkish Competition Board Fines Digiturk

Turkey’s leading pay television service provider, Krea İçerik Hizmetleri ve Prodüksiyon A.Ş. (“Digiturk”), is frequently the subject of complaints made to the Competition Authority (“Authority”). In fact, the Competition Board (“Board”) issues a new decision about Digiturk almost every year. In these decisions...

Competition Law 30.09.2022
The French Competition Authority’s Decision on Meta’s Commitments
Newsletter Articles
The French Competition Authority’s Decision on Meta’s Commitments

The French Competition Authority (Autorité de la Concurrence), within the scope of the competition law proceeding initiated upon the complaint of Criteo SA (“Criteo”), accepted the commitments proposed by Meta Platforms Inc., Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd., and Facebook France...

Competition Law 31.07.2022
A Different Approach to Monetary Fines for Hindering On-Site Inspection: The Decision of the Ankara II. Administrative Court
Newsletter Articles
A Different Approach to Monetary Fines for Hindering On-Site Inspection: The Decision of the Ankara II. Administrative Court

While the scope of Competition Board’s (“Board”) power to conduct on-site inspections has increased with the introduction of Guidelines on Examination of Digital Data during On-site Inspections (“Guidelines”), nowadays the amount of monetary fines imposed on undertakings continue to...

Competition Law 31.07.2022
Hub and Spoke Cartel in Comparative Law
Newsletter Articles
Hub and Spoke Cartel in Comparative Law

The hub and spoke cartel, which is a relatively new type of violation in terms of Turkish competition law, is defined as the indirect exchange of information between two independent undertakings which are horizontal competitors on the supplier or retailer level, through another undertaking...

Competition Law April 2022
The First Settlement Case in Turkish Competition Law
Newsletter Articles
The First Settlement Case in Turkish Competition Law

The settlement mechanism has only recently been introduced to Turkish competition law practice. It entered into force with the amendment made to the Law on the Protection of Competition (“Law”) numbered 4054 on 16.06.2020, and has been in effect for less than two years. In this relatively...

Competition Law April 2022
The E-Marketplace Platforms Sector Inquiry Final Report and What It Brings
Newsletter Articles
The E-Marketplace Platforms Sector Inquiry Final Report and What It Brings

Due to their increasing share in the economy and rapid growth rate, e-marketplace platforms have come under the increasing scrutiny of the Turkish Competition Authority (“Authority”) as well as many competition authorities around the world...

Competition Law April 2022
Amendments Introduced to the Communique Concerning the Mergers and Acquisitions Requiring Competition Board’s Approval
Newsletter Articles
Amendments Introduced to the Communique Concerning the Mergers and Acquisitions Requiring Competition Board’s Approval

Pursuant to the Amendment Communiqué Concerning the Mergers and Acquisitions Requiring the Competition Board’s Approval (“Amending Communiqué”) published in the Official Gazette dated March 4th, 2022 and numbered 31768, certain amendments have been introduced...

Competition Law March 2022
A New Glance at Online Sales: The Competition Board’s BSH Decision
Newsletter Articles
A New Glance at Online Sales: The Competition Board’s BSH Decision

The Competition Board (“Board”) has recently published a reasoned decision in which it evaluated BSH Ev Aletleri Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş.’s (“BSH”) request for negative clearance or exemption with regard to its practice of prohibiting authorized dealers from making sales through online marketplaces...

Competition Law March 2022
E-Marketplace Platforms Industry Review Preliminary Report Part 2: “Shahmaran’s Story”
Newsletter Articles
E-Marketplace Platforms Industry Review Preliminary Report Part 2: “Shahmaran’s Story”

Shahmaran, a Mesopotamian myth, is believed to take place in Tarsus. According to the myth, the shah of snakes is the immortal and omniscient "Shahmaran." Shahmaran is described as a beautiful woman living in her cave with her snakes...

Competition Law February 2022
Online Sales Within The Framework Of Competition Law
Newsletter Articles
The Effects of the Recent Decision by the Turkish Competition Board on Market Chains and Their Suppliers
Newsletter Articles
The Effects of the Recent Decision by the Turkish Competition Board on Market Chains and Their Suppliers

During the COVID-19 pandemic, competitive concerns about the pricing behavior of chain markets, manufacturers, and wholesalers engaged in the retail trade of food and cleaning supplies led to an investigation by...

Competition Law January 2022
On-Site Inspections in Light of the Recent Decisions of the Competition Authority
Newsletter Articles
On-Site Inspections in Light of the Recent Decisions of the Competition Authority

When the past decisions and the recent decisions of the Competition Board (“Board”) are examined, a significant increase can be observed in the number of decisions where the Board found hindrance or obstruction of on-site inspections. This situation shows that...

Competition Law December 2021
The European Commission Fines Banks for Participating in a Forex Cartel
Newsletter Articles
The European Commission Fines Banks for Participating in a Forex Cartel

The European Commission began investigating the collusive behavior of Credit Suisse, UBS, Barclays, RBS, and HSBC in the Foreign Exchange (forex) spot trading market in 2019. With the recent press release dated 02.12.2021, the Commission announced that the case is now closed...

Competition Law December 2021
Hub and Spoke Cartels
Newsletter Articles
Hub and Spoke Cartels
Competition Law November 2021
E-Marketplace Platforms Industry Review Preliminary Report Part 1: “Captain, an object is approaching”
Newsletter Articles
E-Marketplace Platforms Industry Review Preliminary Report Part 1: “Captain, an object is approaching”

Digitalization, in particular, necessitates the rewriting of competition law rules. Competition law is at the center all questions regarding e-commerce and digital platforms. The aforementioned platforms, which have become prominent due to innovations in...

Competition Law November 2021
Coca Cola’s Commitments in the Recent Competition Investigation
Newsletter Articles
Settlement Regulation Enters into Force
Newsletter Articles
Settlement Regulation Enters into Force
Competition Law July 2021
Competition Law Concerns Regarding Human Resources Practices
Newsletter Articles
The New Cartel Decision of the Competition Board
Newsletter Articles
The New Cartel Decision of the Competition Board
Competition Law September 2020
Amendments in the Law on the Protection of Competition
Newsletter Articles
Setting Legal Grounds for On-site Inspections
Newsletter Articles
Evaluation of COVID 19 Outbreak in Terms of Turkish Competition Law
Newsletter Articles
The File of Sahibinden.com; A Phoenix Story
Newsletter Articles
The File of Sahibinden.com; A Phoenix Story
Competition Law February 2020
Final and Interim Decisions of the Turkish Competition Board
Newsletter Articles
Second Stage in Facebook File
Newsletter Articles
Second Stage in Facebook File
Competition Law September 2019
European Commission’s Foreign Exchange Spot Trading Cartel Decisions
Newsletter Articles
Expected Second Half of Competition Authority’s 12 Banks Decision
Newsletter Articles
Turkish Competition Board’s Sahibinden.com Decision
Newsletter Articles
Recent Developments in Abuse of Dominance Concerning Online Platforms
Newsletter Articles
New Horizons in Competition Law; Diesel Emissions Scandal
Newsletter Articles
Recent Developments in the Right of Access to Files
Newsletter Articles
Cards are being redistributed in the Turkish Beer Market
Newsletter Articles
The Recent Motor Vehicles Insurance Decision of the Competition Board
Newsletter Articles
Selective Distribution Systems under the Light of Coty Decision
Newsletter Articles
Competition Authority’s Sector Inquiry Report on Television Broadcasting
Newsletter Articles
Excessive Pricing
Newsletter Articles
Excessive Pricing
Competition Law June 2017
Amazon Decision and E-Book Commitments
Newsletter Articles
Amazon Decision and E-Book Commitments
Competition Law June 2017
Umbrella Effect within the Framework of Private Competition Enforcement
Newsletter Articles
Tüpraş Decision and the Rebate Systems
Newsletter Articles
Tüpraş Decision and the Rebate Systems
Competition Law September 2016
Important Reason in Terms Of Share Transfer Restrictions
Newsletter Articles
Booking.com Decision
Newsletter Articles
Booking.com Decision
Competition Law January 2017
Price / Margin Squeeze
Newsletter Articles
Price / Margin Squeeze
Competition Law November 2016
Recent Problems in Electricity Distribution Sector: ELDER Decision
Newsletter Articles
Intellectual Property Rights As Capital in Kind
Newsletter Articles
Right To Request Information Of The Shareholders in Joint Stock Companies
Newsletter Articles
Affected Market
Newsletter Articles
Affected Market
Competition Law August 2015

For creative legal solutions, please contact us.