Supervision of Concentrations in Competition Law
Introduction
Mergers and acquisitions are one of the fundamental concepts of dynamic economies. However, in order to maintain a competitive environment in the marketplace, mergers and acquisitions must be subject to the supervision of the Competition Authority (“Authority”). Thus, in order to avoid abuse of the dominant position and prohibition of uncompetitive mergers and acquisitions, the Authority has the task of monitoring, regulating and supervising the markets[1].
Concept of Concentration
Despite the fact that competition law regulations contain the concept of ‘mergers and acquisitions,’ they do not provide their exact definitions. In accordance with Communiqué No. 2010/4 Concerning the Mergers and Acquisitions Calling for the Authorization of the Competition Board (“Communiqué”), the merger of two or more undertakings, acquisition of direct or indirect control over all, or part of one or more undertakings, by one or more undertakings, or by one or more persons who currently control at least one undertaking, through the purchase of shares or assets, through a contract or through any other means, shall be considered a “merger or acquisition” by the Authority. Moreover, the establishment of a joint venture that performs all operations of an independent economic asset shall be considered as a merger and acquisition, as well[2].
In practice, it could be observed that the terms of a merger and acquisition or concentration are being used as substitutes for each other. However, there is no unity in the usage of such terms, neither in practice, nor in the doctrine. Although Draft of the Law to Amend the Protection of Competition No. 4054 carries the term, ‘concentration transactions,’ the term of ‘merger and acquisition’ is used in Law on the Protection of Competition No. 4054 (“LPC”) and the Communiqué.
Nevertheless, other than mergers and acquisitions, concentrations might be performed through the establishment of a joint venture, as well. A concentration can be defined as the power of economic decision-making and leading; in other words, changing hands of economic control between the undertakings and, thus, the creation of a situation that leads to structural modifications in the related market by lessening the number of players in such market.[3] In order for all activities that cause the central concentration to be considered within the scope of the LPC, it might be more accurate to use the word ‘concentration,’ instead of the term ‘merger and acquisition.’[4]
Supervision of Concentrations
Mergers and acquisitions might damage a competitive environment via monopolization and cartelization. Therefore, all competition rules of developed countries contain provisions regarding the supervision of mergers and acquisitions.[5]
Article 7 of the LPC entitled “Mergers or Acquisitions” prohibits mergers by one or more undertakings, or acquisitions by an undertaking or a person from another undertaking that aims to create or strengthen a dominant position, which would result in a significant lessening of competition. Therefore, in order for a merger or an acquisition to be prohibited, it should either (i) create or strengthen a dominant position or (ii) the created or strengthened dominant position should significantly lessen the effective competition.
This provision does not prohibit an undertaking being in a dominant position. An undertaking might become dominant solely through its own dynamics and success. The intended prohibition is the dominant position of an undertaking that is achieved without relying on the current efficiency of the established capacity.[6] Undertakings in dominant positions might perform concentration transactions; yet, the undertaking with a dominant position shall not significantly lessen competition with the aim to strengthen its dominant position.
The kinds of mergers and acquisitions subject to the Competition Board’s (“Board”) authorization are stipulated under the Communiqué. Each concentration shall not be subject to the Board’s supervision or control. The mergers and acquisitions that are subject, or not, to the Board’s authorization are explicitly set forth in the Communiqué.
Concentrations Subject, and not Subject to, the Board’s Authorization
In order for a merger or an acquisition to take place, there must be two independent undertakings. If a merger occurs with two dependent companies, namely, companies in the same group, such transaction shall not be considered as a merger, nor as an acquisition, in terms of the competition law.[7] Thus, such types of mergers shall not require authorization.
Article 6 of the Communiqué stipulates the transactions that are not deemed as a merger or an acquisition. In accordance with the Communiqué, intra-group transactions that do not lead to a change of control shall not subject to the Board’s authorization. The significant matter here is the event of change of control following a merger or acquisition. If the control of an undertaking or a company remains the same following the transfer of its shares, in other words, if only the minority shares are transferred, then such transaction shall not be considered as a merger or acquisition as per the competition law and, thus, shall not be subject to authorization.[8]
In accordance with Art. 7(1) of the Communiqué, in a merger or acquisition transaction that creates a definite change in control, Board authorization shall be required for the relevant transaction to carry legal validity if a) total turnovers of the transaction parties in Turkey exceed one hundred million TL, and turnovers of at least two of the transaction parties in Turkey each exceed thirty million TL, or b) global turnover of one of the transaction parties exceeds five hundred million TL, and at least one of the other transaction parties has a turnover in Turkey that exceeds five million TL.
Another factor to be considered in the determination of whether or not to obtain authorization of the Board, other than thresholds, is the concept of ‘affected market.’ As per Art. 7(2) of the Communiqué, authorization of the Board shall not be required for transactions without any affected market, even if the thresholds listed in the Communiqué (Art. 7(1)) are exceeded. Hence, joint ventures are excepted. For the transactions regarding establishment of joint ventures, Board authorization shall be required, without considering whether there is an affected market or not, if the thresholds are exceeded.
Notification to the Board
Article 11 of the LPC shall be applied in cases where the Board is notified, or is notified with delay. In accordance with the said Article, if the Board does not consider the transaction as lessening competition via creating or strengthening a dominant position, then it allows the merger or acquisition, but imposes fines on those concerned due to their failure to notify. If the Board decides that the merger or acquisition is lessening competition via creating or strengthening a dominant position, it decides to terminate the merger or acquisition transaction, and imposes fines, in order to eliminate all de facto situations committed that are contrary to the law.
The notification to the Authority regarding mergers and acquisitions that are subject to authorization shall be made via the Notification Form Pertaining to Mergers and Acquisitions (“Notification Form”) that is attached to the Communiqué. Easier procedure of application is envisaged for transactions that are less likely to damage the competitive environment, by excluding certain parts of the Notification Form.
As a conclusion of the evaluation of mergers and acquisitions that are subject to authorization, the Board either authorizes the transaction, or initiates a final investigation. Mergers or acquisitions that lead to significant lessening in competition, either in the entire country, or in a certain part of it, by creating or strengthening the dominant position, shall not be authorized. In such case, the merger or acquisition transaction shall be held in abeyance until the final decision of the Board. In addition, as per Art. 14 of the Communiqué, in order to eliminate any competition issues that may arise under Article 7 of the LPC, undertakings may give commitments concerning mergers or acquisitions. The Board may specify conditions and obligations aimed at ensuring that any such commitments are fulfilled. Such commitments may be given at the preliminary examination, or during the final investigation stages.
Furthermore, the Board shall also be notified of mergers and acquisitions transactions conducted abroad if they exceed the thresholds stipulated under Art. 7 of the Communiqué, and if Turkish markets are effected.
Conclusion
In the Mergers and Acquisitions Report of 2014[9] (as published by the Authority) the Authority was notified of 215 mergers and acquisitions. When the number and value of the mergers and acquisitions transactions performed are taken into consideration, the importance of the supervision of concentration transactions must be emphasized more. The independent undertakings that intend to perform concentration transactions must consider that the transaction shall not create nor strengthen their dominant position, or their strengthened dominant position shall not significantly lessen competition.
- For the 16th Annual Report of the Competition Authority please see: http://www.rekabet.gov.tr/File/?path=ROOT%2f1%2fDocuments%2fFaaliyet+Raporlar%C4%B1%2fRK_16.pdf (Access Date: 28.09.2015).
- For the Merger and Acquisition View Report of the Competition Authority please see: http://www.rekabet.gov.tr/File/?path=ROOT%2f1%2fDocuments%2fBirle%C5%9Fme+Devralma+G%C3%B6r%C3%BCn%C3%BCm+Raporu%2fEk1+-+2014+Birle%C5%9Fme+Devralma+G%C3%B6r%C3%BCn%C3%BCm+Raporu.pdf (Access Date: 28.09.2015).
- Sezen, Ayse, Birlesme ve Devralmalar, Uluslararasi Rekabet ve Teknoloji Birligi, 2007, p. 2.
- Erdem, H. Ercument, Turk-İsvicre Rekabet Hukuklarında Birlesme ve Devralmalar, Prof. Dr. Erdogan Moroğlu’na 65 Yaş Günü Armağanı, 1999, p. 203.
- Erdem, H. Ercument, Turk ve AT Rekabet Hukukunda Birlesme ve Devralmalar, 2013, p. 32.
- Aslan, Yilmaz, Rekabet Hukuku Dersleri, 2014, p. 212.
- Aslan, Yilmaz, Rekabet Hukuku Dersleri, 2014, p. 213.
- Aslan, Yilmaz, Rekabet Hukuku Dersleri, 2014, p. 213.
- For the Report please see: http://www.rekabet.gov.tr/File/?path=ROOT%2F1%2FDocuments%2FBirle%C5%9Fme+Devralma+G%C3%B6r%C3%BCn%C3%BCm+Raporu%2FEk1+-+2014+Birle%C5%9Fme+Devralma+G%C3%B6r%C3%BCn%C3%BCm+Raporu.pdf (Access Date: 28.09.2015).
All rights of this article are reserved. This article may not be used, reproduced, copied, published, distributed, or otherwise disseminated without quotation or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm's written consent. Any content created without citing the resource or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm’s written consent is regularly tracked, and legal action will be taken in case of violation.
Other Contents
The startup ecosystem in Turkey has experienced notable growth in recent years. In the last quarter of 2023, 81 startups secured a combined investment of around 60 million dollars. While the number of investments remained consistent when comparing the third quarter periods of 2022-2023, there was a decrease...
Hub and Spoke cartel is a type of violation that is not clearly defined and regulated under Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”). Decisional practices of foreign competition authorities, particularly the UK Competition and Markets Authority’s decisions (“CMA”), are instructive concerning...
The Competition Board ("Board") made an addition to its line of decisions on resale price maintenance with its decision on Sunny Elektronik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş. ("Sunny") . In its decision, the Board thoroughly examined the allegations regarding Sunny's involvement in maintaining resale prices and restricting...
It is observed that the Competition Authority (“Authority”) has recently scrutinized various industries such as fast-moving consumer goods, labor market, pharmaceuticals, and cement. When the reasoned decisions of the Competition Board (“Board”) published in October are examined, it can be seen that the...
Jules Verne says, “Everything on earth has a limited lifespan, nothing that will exist forever can be created by human hands”. Perhaps change is the only constant concept in all our lives. Despite two major world wars and countless periods of crisis, humanity has been undergoing a great change and...
At the meeting of the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (“FIFA”) held on 16 December 2022, the FIFA Council approved the FIFA Football Agents Regulations (“FFAR”). In the FFAR, various amendments have been made, such as the introduction of a maximum service fee limit that football agents are...
Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) is still considered a hardcore restriction under the recently revised Vertical Block Exemption Regulation (VBER), which means that it cannot benefit from a statutory exemption under Article 101(1) TFEU, unlike certain other types of vertical agreements. However, it has been debated...
In competition law, it is important to accurately determine the concept of undertaking, especially in terms of mergers and acquisitions. Therefore, the concept of economic entity aims to reveal the economic units covered by the undertakings. The relationship between the concept of economic entity and family ties comes...
In these days when the Competition Board (“Board”) frequently imposes administrative fines for preventing on-site inspections and both the Competition Authority (“Authority”) and undertakings take legal and technical measures regarding on-site inspections, a striking development has occurred. In its decision...
Online advertising has become an important source for businesses for promoting products and services and meeting consumers, as a result of the rapid development of information technologies and increase in the use of internet. Delivering targeted messages to consumers at the right time through the digital...
Selective distribution systems refer to a type of distribution system in which suppliers commit to selling the contracted goods or services directly or indirectly to distributors selected based on specified criteria, while the distributors commit not to sell the said goods or services to unauthorized...
Fast-moving consumer goods is undoubtedly one of the sectors that the Competition Authority has been working most intensively since the COVID 19 pandemic. Among the most important developments of this period was the Sector Inquiry initiated on Fast Moving Consumer Goods (“FMCG”) Retailing...
In the decision of the Constitutional Court ("Constitutional Court" or "Court") dated 09.11.2022, numbered 2020/67 E. 2022/139 K. (the "Decision"), the annulment of certain articles of the Law Amending the Law on the Protection of Competition No. 4054 ("Law No. 7246") was requested...
In Turkish competition law, certain types of mergers and acquisitions are subject to Turkish Competition Board’s (“Board”) approval in order to gain legal validity. Pursuant to Article 7 of the Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”), the Board is competent to define mergers and acquisitions...
Recently, the Competition Board (the Board) had imposed administrative fines on banks and financial institutions for failing to respond to the request for information within the scope of a preliminary investigation.[i] The request for information that lays the groundwork for the administrative fine imposed by...
Amazon, a world-famous company, is an e-commerce company that operates the world’s largest online shopping platform. In the backstage, Amazon is a data-driven company whose retail decisions are mostly driven by automated systems, fueled by the relevant market data. That being said, Amazon has a dual...
The right to make on-site inspections is one of the Competition Board’s (“Board”) most important tools for revealing whether Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”) has been violated. The effective use of this authority is quite important in terms of obtaining fruitful results from...
“Harese” is an interesting Arabic word. There is a thorn that camels love very much in the desert. The camel eats the thorn with great greed. So much so that, its mouth bleeds as it eats, but it doesn't stop eating. The taste of the thorn is mixed with the salty taste of its own blood. This mixed taste drives the camel...
Turkey’s leading pay television service provider, Krea İçerik Hizmetleri ve Prodüksiyon A.Ş. (“Digiturk”), is frequently the subject of complaints made to the Competition Authority (“Authority”). In fact, the Competition Board (“Board”) issues a new decision about Digiturk almost every year. In these decisions...
The French Competition Authority (Autorité de la Concurrence), within the scope of the competition law proceeding initiated upon the complaint of Criteo SA (“Criteo”), accepted the commitments proposed by Meta Platforms Inc., Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd., and Facebook France...
While the scope of Competition Board’s (“Board”) power to conduct on-site inspections has increased with the introduction of Guidelines on Examination of Digital Data during On-site Inspections (“Guidelines”), nowadays the amount of monetary fines imposed on undertakings continue to...
The hub and spoke cartel, which is a relatively new type of violation in terms of Turkish competition law, is defined as the indirect exchange of information between two independent undertakings which are horizontal competitors on the supplier or retailer level, through another undertaking...
The settlement mechanism has only recently been introduced to Turkish competition law practice. It entered into force with the amendment made to the Law on the Protection of Competition (“Law”) numbered 4054 on 16.06.2020, and has been in effect for less than two years. In this relatively...
Due to their increasing share in the economy and rapid growth rate, e-marketplace platforms have come under the increasing scrutiny of the Turkish Competition Authority (“Authority”) as well as many competition authorities around the world...
Pursuant to the Amendment Communiqué Concerning the Mergers and Acquisitions Requiring the Competition Board’s Approval (“Amending Communiqué”) published in the Official Gazette dated March 4th, 2022 and numbered 31768, certain amendments have been introduced...
The Competition Board (“Board”) has recently published a reasoned decision in which it evaluated BSH Ev Aletleri Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş.’s (“BSH”) request for negative clearance or exemption with regard to its practice of prohibiting authorized dealers from making sales through online marketplaces...
Shahmaran, a Mesopotamian myth, is believed to take place in Tarsus. According to the myth, the shah of snakes is the immortal and omniscient "Shahmaran." Shahmaran is described as a beautiful woman living in her cave with her snakes...
During the COVID-19 pandemic, competitive concerns about the pricing behavior of chain markets, manufacturers, and wholesalers engaged in the retail trade of food and cleaning supplies led to an investigation by...
When the past decisions and the recent decisions of the Competition Board (“Board”) are examined, a significant increase can be observed in the number of decisions where the Board found hindrance or obstruction of on-site inspections. This situation shows that...
The European Commission began investigating the collusive behavior of Credit Suisse, UBS, Barclays, RBS, and HSBC in the Foreign Exchange (forex) spot trading market in 2019. With the recent press release dated 02.12.2021, the Commission announced that the case is now closed...
Digitalization, in particular, necessitates the rewriting of competition law rules. Competition law is at the center all questions regarding e-commerce and digital platforms. The aforementioned platforms, which have become prominent due to innovations in...