Turkish Competition Board’s Decision on the DFDS-Ekol Lojistik Acquisition
Introduction
The Turkish Competition Board’s (Board) decision regarding the acquisition of the international road transport business line of Ekol Lojistik AŞ (Ekol) by DFDS A/S (DFDS) has been one of the most prominent transactions on the competition law agenda recently. The transaction (the Transaction) envisages the transfer of Ekol’s road transport business line and EUTS[1] to Ekol Lojistik, which was controlled by Ekol before the Transaction, through a partial spin-off, followed by the acquisition of Ekol Lojistik[2] in its entirety by DFDS. As a result of the Board’s preliminary examination of the Transaction and the commitments submitted by the parties, the Board conditionally rendered a clearance decision on the Transaction (Board Decision)[3] . The evaluations in the relevant Board Decision are essential in analyzing the effects of vertical acquisitions on market dynamics and possible competition problems.
Assessment of the Relevant Product Market and Geographic Market
Within the scope of the Transaction, it is determined that there is no horizontal overlap between Ekol Lojistik and DFDS. However there is a vertical overlap between Ekol Lojistik’s operations, namely international freight transportation by road, and the Ro-Ro transportation market in which DFDS operates. In this framework, the Board evaluated whether road transportation is considered an alternative to Ro-Ro transportation to determine the relevant markets. It is concluded that Ro-Ro and road transportation differ in terms of speed, safety, personnel employed, business model, necessary equipment, and fields of activity, and therefore the two types of transportation cannot be considered in the same market. Thus, within the scope of the Transaction, two separate relevant product markets are defined as “international transportation activities by road” and “Ro-Ro transportation market”. Considering the previous precedents, the relevant geographic market for Ro-Ro transportation services was defined as “Ro-Ro lines between Türkiye and Europe”. Within the scope of international freight transportation by road, the relevant geographical market was described as “Türkiye” since the relevant activities were generally directed to Türkiye.
Competitive Analysis of the Transaction
Within the Transaction scope, it is considered that the Ro-Ro transportation market and the international freight transportation market by road are vertically related markets, where the Ro-Ro transportation market is the upstream market and the international freight transportation market by land is the downstream market. In this respect, the Transaction assessment is made under two categories: market-closing effects and coordination-inducing effects that may arise as a result of a non-horizontal merger.
The Board considered separate assessments regarding market closure concerns that may arise due to the Transaction according to input restriction and customer restriction risks. Accordingly, it is first assessed whether the relevant input is essential for production in the downstream market. It is also emphasized that for a market closure to occur, the vertically integrated undertaking should have a specific market power in the upstream market. Accordingly, it is accepted that the Ro-Ro transportation service offered by DFDS in the upstream market is an essential input for the international transportation by road market. In this context, the market power of DFDS in the Ro-Ro transportation market is analyzed and it is determined that the market share of DFDS exceeds the dominant position threshold.
On the other hand, for an undertaking to have an incentive to restrict inputs, the restriction must be profitable and rational. According to the assessments made in this context, when the low- profit rates of Ekol Lojistik in the road transportation market are compared to the high-profit rates of DFDS in the Ro-Ro transportation market, it is unlikely that DFDS has an input restriction motive in the downstream market at the expense of sacrificing its profit in the upstream market or jeopardizing its trade with its customers[4] . Finally, considering the importance of occupancy rates and economies of scale in the Ro-Ro transportation market, DFDS, which operates in the more profitable upstream market, may experience losses in Ro-Ro transportation service sales in case of input restrictions after the transaction. Therefore, although DFDS has significant market power in the upstream markets compared to its competitors, the combined undertaking is unlikely to have an input restriction motive, given that the customers of DFDS have a significant share in DFDS’s total sales, that the undertaking’s share in the downstream market will remain low after the transaction, and that its profit margins in the relevant upstream market are already higher than its profit margins in the downstream market.
The Board also evaluated the possibility that Ekol Lojistik may divert its purchases to DFDS after the vertical integration, and the market closing effects of this possibility. As a result, Ekol Lojistik would not be considered a significant market share customer as it only purchases a limited portion of its services from competing providers. Therefore, the Transaction will not have a significant anti-competitive effect related to the customer restriction, as it will not significantly contribute to competitors’ market shares. Moreover, due to the intense competitive environment in the downstream market and the limited market power of Ekol Lojistik, competitors can turn to alternative customers. Therefore, as the market structure for other competing Ro-Ro operators will remain largely the same after the Transaction, it is concluded that there will be no motive for customer restriction for the merged undertaking.
Other concerns raised in the context of the Transaction include the risk of competitively sensitive information exchange because DFDS holds information such as shipper and consignee information of its customers within the scope of Ro-Ro transportation business, title of the transporter, description of the cargo, quantity, weight, value of the cargo, port of origin and port of destination, and Ekol Lojistik will have access to this information after the Transaction. In this context, the fact that Ekol Lojistik will have access to the information obtained by DFDS from transportation undertakings within the scope of its activities after the Transaction may put Ekol Lojistik in an advantageous position when it is compared to other transportation undertakings. The Board Decision also addresses the concerns raised by the shipping undertakings regarding discrimination against Ekol Lojistik in the onboarding and booking phases after the transaction.
Finally, concerning the analysis of the coordination effects, it is assessed that a horizontal concentration will not arise as a result of the Transaction, and a buyer with a significant market share will not join the combined undertaking due to vertical concentration. Although it is foreseen that the likelihood of coordinated behavior in the downstream or upstream market after the Transaction is low, it is assessed that the commitments made by the parties may eliminate the possibility of such coordination risk.
Commitments Submitted within the Scope of the Transaction
DFDS has provided several commitment proposals to address concerns about the sharing of commercially sensitive information with Ekol and discrimination in favor of Ekol Lojistik. The commitments include that DFDS's Ro-Ro business unit in Turkey will operate as a separate legal entity, the managers and employees responsible for the Mediterranean Business Unit of both Ekol Lojistik and DFDS will remain completely independent, and employees in shared support functions - such as accounting, human resources, and information technology departments - will be prohibited from making commercial decisions or sharing commercially sensitive information outside the business unit to which they belong. In addition, DFDS has undertaken to not directly or indirectly share commercially sensitive information obtained as a Ro-Ro carrier with Ekol Lojistik and that Ekol Lojistik and DFDS will completely separate data access by using different information systems. Accordingly, employees of one business unit will be prevented from accessing customer information that belongs to the other business unit, and DFDS’s pre-transaction reservation and embarkation procedures will be maintained for all customers after the transaction without any change. In this context, the commitments above have been deemed sufficient to eliminate the competition problems that as a result of the Transaction and the Transaction was given conditional clearance.
Dissenting Opinion on the Board Decision
In the dissenting vote of the Board Decision, it was emphasized that DFDS has an indispensable position in the upstream market with its Ro-Ro transportation service and will become the most essential player in the international freight transportation market by road due to the Transaction. In this context, it is assessed that DFDS may abuse its dominant position in the upstream market against competing undertakings in the market in which Ekol also operates, and that the commitments offered by DFDS are insufficient to address these concerns. In addition, because the undertakings, whose opinions were consulted within the scope of the file, the Transaction would adversely affect competition and that the Transaction would not result in any efficiency, therefore a clearance decision should not be rendered for the Transaction.
Conclusion
The vertical Transaction involving the acquisition of Ekol Lojistik’s road transportation activities by DFDS generated diverse opinions among market participants and underwent a thorough assessment under competition law. Consequently, concerns such as market foreclosure, sharing of competition-sensitive information, and discriminatory practices were raised about the Transaction. Nonetheless, the Board determined that the commitments provided by DFDS were adequate to address the competition concerns and conditionally approved the Transaction. The Board’s decision, along with the dissenting opinion, serves as a significant example of competition concerns arising from vertical mergers or acquisitions where parties hold substantial market power, and the evaluation of commitments proposed to mitigate such problems.
- The undertakings EUTS SRL, EUTS GmbH, EUTS BV are collectively referred to as ‘EUTS’.
- Reference made to Ekol’s international road transport business and EUTS.
- Board’s decision dated 26.07.2023 and numbered 23-34/643-216
- Board’s Tesco/Kipa decision dated 09.02.2017 and numbered 17-06/56-22.
All rights of this article are reserved. This article may not be used, reproduced, copied, published, distributed, or otherwise disseminated without quotation or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm's written consent. Any content created without citing the resource or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm’s written consent is regularly tracked, and legal action will be taken in case of violation.
Other Contents
The Competition Board (“Board”) has broad powers to request information from undertakings. The Board’s authority to request information arises from Article 14 of the Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”). Under the relevant provision, the Board may request any information it deems...
Doğuş Otomotiv Servis ve Ticaret A.Ş. (Doğuş) applied to the Turkish Competition Authority for an exemption for the practice of recommending basic wages to be applied to sales and after-sales service employees of its authorized dealers and distributors...
Access to Instagram was blocked ex officio by the Information and Communication Technologies Authority (ICTA) as of 2.08.2024. Under Article 8 of Law No. 5651 on the Regulation of Publications on the Internet and Combating Crimes Committed Through These Publications, ICTA can issue an ex officio access...
It is well known that agreements between employer undertakings with regards to their employees, such as wage-fixing and non-poaching agreements, along with competitively sensitive information exchanges have been under the scrutiny of competition authorities all over the world, including the Turkish Competition...
Automotive is one of the sectors in which the world’s most significant investments are made. The Competition Board (“Board”) has been closely interested in the automotive sector over the years and has conducted various examinations and studies in this field...
Competition authorities around the world continue unabated to investigate competition concerns arising from data collection and processing activities of digital platforms and impose severe sanctions as a result...
The startup ecosystem in Turkey has experienced notable growth in recent years. In the last quarter of 2023, 81 startups secured a combined investment of around 60 million dollars. While the number of investments remained consistent when comparing the third quarter periods of 2022-2023, there was a decrease...
Hub and Spoke cartel is a type of violation that is not clearly defined and regulated under Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”). Decisional practices of foreign competition authorities, particularly the UK Competition and Markets Authority’s decisions (“CMA”), are instructive concerning...
The Competition Board ("Board") made an addition to its line of decisions on resale price maintenance with its decision on Sunny Elektronik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş. ("Sunny") . In its decision, the Board thoroughly examined the allegations regarding Sunny's involvement in maintaining resale prices and restricting...
It is observed that the Competition Authority (“Authority”) has recently scrutinized various industries such as fast-moving consumer goods, labor market, pharmaceuticals, and cement. When the reasoned decisions of the Competition Board (“Board”) published in October are examined, it can be seen that the...
Jules Verne says, “Everything on earth has a limited lifespan, nothing that will exist forever can be created by human hands”. Perhaps change is the only constant concept in all our lives. Despite two major world wars and countless periods of crisis, humanity has been undergoing a great change and...
At the meeting of the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (“FIFA”) held on 16 December 2022, the FIFA Council approved the FIFA Football Agents Regulations (“FFAR”). In the FFAR, various amendments have been made, such as the introduction of a maximum service fee limit that football agents are...
Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) is still considered a hardcore restriction under the recently revised Vertical Block Exemption Regulation (VBER), which means that it cannot benefit from a statutory exemption under Article 101(1) TFEU, unlike certain other types of vertical agreements. However, it has been debated...
In competition law, it is important to accurately determine the concept of undertaking, especially in terms of mergers and acquisitions. Therefore, the concept of economic entity aims to reveal the economic units covered by the undertakings. The relationship between the concept of economic entity and family ties comes...
In these days when the Competition Board (“Board”) frequently imposes administrative fines for preventing on-site inspections and both the Competition Authority (“Authority”) and undertakings take legal and technical measures regarding on-site inspections, a striking development has occurred. In its decision...
Online advertising has become an important source for businesses for promoting products and services and meeting consumers, as a result of the rapid development of information technologies and increase in the use of internet. Delivering targeted messages to consumers at the right time through the digital...
Selective distribution systems refer to a type of distribution system in which suppliers commit to selling the contracted goods or services directly or indirectly to distributors selected based on specified criteria, while the distributors commit not to sell the said goods or services to unauthorized...
Fast-moving consumer goods is undoubtedly one of the sectors that the Competition Authority has been working most intensively since the COVID 19 pandemic. Among the most important developments of this period was the Sector Inquiry initiated on Fast Moving Consumer Goods (“FMCG”) Retailing...
In the decision of the Constitutional Court ("Constitutional Court" or "Court") dated 09.11.2022, numbered 2020/67 E. 2022/139 K. (the "Decision"), the annulment of certain articles of the Law Amending the Law on the Protection of Competition No. 4054 ("Law No. 7246") was requested...
In Turkish competition law, certain types of mergers and acquisitions are subject to Turkish Competition Board’s (“Board”) approval in order to gain legal validity. Pursuant to Article 7 of the Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”), the Board is competent to define mergers and acquisitions...
Recently, the Competition Board (the Board) had imposed administrative fines on banks and financial institutions for failing to respond to the request for information within the scope of a preliminary investigation.[i] The request for information that lays the groundwork for the administrative fine imposed by...
Amazon, a world-famous company, is an e-commerce company that operates the world’s largest online shopping platform. In the backstage, Amazon is a data-driven company whose retail decisions are mostly driven by automated systems, fueled by the relevant market data. That being said, Amazon has a dual...
The right to make on-site inspections is one of the Competition Board’s (“Board”) most important tools for revealing whether Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”) has been violated. The effective use of this authority is quite important in terms of obtaining fruitful results from...
“Harese” is an interesting Arabic word. There is a thorn that camels love very much in the desert. The camel eats the thorn with great greed. So much so that, its mouth bleeds as it eats, but it doesn't stop eating. The taste of the thorn is mixed with the salty taste of its own blood. This mixed taste drives the camel...
Turkey’s leading pay television service provider, Krea İçerik Hizmetleri ve Prodüksiyon A.Ş. (“Digiturk”), is frequently the subject of complaints made to the Competition Authority (“Authority”). In fact, the Competition Board (“Board”) issues a new decision about Digiturk almost every year. In these decisions...
The French Competition Authority (Autorité de la Concurrence), within the scope of the competition law proceeding initiated upon the complaint of Criteo SA (“Criteo”), accepted the commitments proposed by Meta Platforms Inc., Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd., and Facebook France...
While the scope of Competition Board’s (“Board”) power to conduct on-site inspections has increased with the introduction of Guidelines on Examination of Digital Data during On-site Inspections (“Guidelines”), nowadays the amount of monetary fines imposed on undertakings continue to...
The hub and spoke cartel, which is a relatively new type of violation in terms of Turkish competition law, is defined as the indirect exchange of information between two independent undertakings which are horizontal competitors on the supplier or retailer level, through another undertaking...
The settlement mechanism has only recently been introduced to Turkish competition law practice. It entered into force with the amendment made to the Law on the Protection of Competition (“Law”) numbered 4054 on 16.06.2020, and has been in effect for less than two years. In this relatively...
Due to their increasing share in the economy and rapid growth rate, e-marketplace platforms have come under the increasing scrutiny of the Turkish Competition Authority (“Authority”) as well as many competition authorities around the world...
Pursuant to the Amendment Communiqué Concerning the Mergers and Acquisitions Requiring the Competition Board’s Approval (“Amending Communiqué”) published in the Official Gazette dated March 4th, 2022 and numbered 31768, certain amendments have been introduced...
The Competition Board (“Board”) has recently published a reasoned decision in which it evaluated BSH Ev Aletleri Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş.’s (“BSH”) request for negative clearance or exemption with regard to its practice of prohibiting authorized dealers from making sales through online marketplaces...
Shahmaran, a Mesopotamian myth, is believed to take place in Tarsus. According to the myth, the shah of snakes is the immortal and omniscient "Shahmaran." Shahmaran is described as a beautiful woman living in her cave with her snakes...
During the COVID-19 pandemic, competitive concerns about the pricing behavior of chain markets, manufacturers, and wholesalers engaged in the retail trade of food and cleaning supplies led to an investigation by...
When the past decisions and the recent decisions of the Competition Board (“Board”) are examined, a significant increase can be observed in the number of decisions where the Board found hindrance or obstruction of on-site inspections. This situation shows that...
The European Commission began investigating the collusive behavior of Credit Suisse, UBS, Barclays, RBS, and HSBC in the Foreign Exchange (forex) spot trading market in 2019. With the recent press release dated 02.12.2021, the Commission announced that the case is now closed...
Digitalization, in particular, necessitates the rewriting of competition law rules. Competition law is at the center all questions regarding e-commerce and digital platforms. The aforementioned platforms, which have become prominent due to innovations in...