Two Landmark Decisions on Sub-Threshold Merger Control
Introduction
Mergers and acquisitions are among the types of transactions that are subject to intensive scrutiny by competition authorities. As a rule, competition authorities only subject transactions that exceed certain turnover thresholds and result in a change of control to merger control; transactions below these thresholds are not subject to notification requirements. This approach has been adopted not only because it is impractical to scrutinize every acquisition, but also to limit the transaction costs that a comprehensive review would entail for transactions posing a low competition risk and to direct the authorities' resources towards more critical transactions.
However, one of the fundamental issues that has long been debated in competition law practice is how to review acquisitions that fall below the notification thresholds but are of a strategic nature. This debate has been particularly prominent in the technology sector; the risk of weakening competition through the acquisition of small-scale but innovative and promising ventures (killer acquisitions) has prompted competition authorities to develop new tools. Indeed, the Competition Authority has recently included acquisitions of technology ventures in its scope of review, regardless of whether the target company exceeds the turnover threshold.
On the other hand, decisions made by the German and French competition authorities in late 2025 clearly demonstrated that mergers and acquisitions that do not meet general turnover thresholds, i.e., those classified as "below the threshold," can be regulated using different legal instruments. Although these decisions are exceptional in nature, they have important consequences in terms of competition law enforcement and have led to extensive debate. This article briefly discusses the noteworthy decisions of the two authorities in question.
German Cartel Office’s Rethmann Group Decision: Ex-Ante Notification Obligation for Below-Threshold Transactions
The German Cartel Office (Bundeskartellamt), in November 2025, ruled on the Rethmann Group, which includes the waste management company Remondis[1] , requiring the group to notify the Cartel Office three years in advance of any future mergers and acquisitions it intends to carry out in the waste management sector, particularly in the areas of non-hazardous municipal waste collection and glass waste processing. This decision is of particular importance as it represents the first concrete application of Section 32f(2) of the German Competition Act (Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen – GWB).
GWB Section 32f(2), which came into force in 2021 and was extended in scope at the end of 2023, constitutes an exceptional provision in the merger control regime. This provision allows transactions below the threshold to be subject to review by the German Cartel Office under certain conditions. The fundamental aim of the regulation is to preventively control transactions that fall outside the classic threshold system but have the potential to structurally restrict competition.
Under this provision, following a completed sector inquiry, the German Cartel Office may impose a notification obligation on a particular undertaking if there are objective and verifiable indications that future mergers and acquisitions by that undertaking could significantly impede competition. This notification obligation is valid for three years and is subject to the condition that the transaction is not insignificant and that the target undertaking achieves a turnover of at least EUR 100,000 in the relevant activities.
The Rethmann decision is based on the findings of the German Cartel Office's comprehensive investigation into the waste management sector, completed at the end of 2023[2] . The investigation found that the Rethmann Group is the market leader in the collection of non-hazardous municipal waste and in the glass waste processing market, both nationally and in various federal states, and that it has a strong financial structure and a clear advantage over its competitors. The Group companies' exceptionally strong access to the relevant regional markets, their widespread geographical presence, and the increased barriers to entry in the market as a result of previous acquisitions were particularly highlighted. Furthermore, it was determined that the number of bidders in waste collection tenders launched by municipalities and in tenders related to the packaging recycling system (duales System) has steadily decreased. In this context, the German Cartel Office concluded that even the acquisition of small-scale competitors operating only at the regional level could further weaken the competitive structure in the long term.
The Rethmann decision is an important milestone in the German merger and acquisition control regime. The decision demonstrates that the Cartel Office can conduct ex-ante reviews of transactions that fall below the threshold but pose a structural competition risk, going beyond its traditional supervisory approach. In this respect, the decision sets a precedent, particularly for concentrated sectors with high barriers to entry.
French Competition Authority's Doctolib Decision: Ex-Post Intervention in Sub-Threshold Mergers
In its November 2025 Doctolib decision, the French Competition Authority (Autorité de la concurrence)[3] assessed and sanctioned an acquisition that fell below national notification thresholds and was therefore not subject to ex-ante review, for the first time on the grounds of abuse of a dominant position.
Doctolib is a digital health platform offering online medical appointment booking and remote medical consultation services in France. Doctolib's acquisition of MonDocteur, one of its main competitors, in 2018 was not subject to any review, as it fell below both national and EU merger control thresholds. However, the French Competition Authority's investigation into Doctolib in 2021 has brought this transaction back into the spotlight.
The investigation concluded that Doctolib had been dominant in the online medical appointment booking market since at least 2017, with its market share consistently exceeding 50% between 2017 and 2022 and exceeding 90% in some years. Similarly, it was determined that Doctolib also held a dominant position in the remote medical consultation solutions market. It was established that following the acquisition, Doctolib permanently increased its market share, raised its prices several times, and did not experience any significant customer loss despite these increases.
Under the French merger and acquisition control regime (Code de commerce m. L.430-2), only transactions exceeding certain turnover thresholds are subject to notification. However, the Doctolib decision is noteworthy in that it clearly establishes that below-threshold transactions can be reviewed ex post.
The legal basis for the decision is the European Court of Justice's Towercast ruling (C-449/21) dated 16 March 2023. In the Towercast judgment, the Court of Justice clearly stated that there is no legal obstacle preventing a transaction not subject to notification under EU or national merger control from being assessed under Article 102 TFEU as an abuse of a dominant position. The Court also stated that Merger Regulation No 139/2004 cannot prevent national competition authorities and courts from examining mergers without an EU dimension on the basis of the direct effect of Article 102 TFEU.
In light of all these assessments, the French Competition Authority imposed a fine of €4.6 million on Doctolib for its behavior aimed at closing the market and excluding competitors , and found that Doctolib had acquired its competitor MonDocteur with the aim of eliminating it and closing the market. Although this acquisition fell below the notification threshold, the Authority imposed a limited and symbolic fine of €50,000, taking into account that the infringement occurred prior to the Towercast decision. Finally, Doctolib was required to publish a summary of the decision in the Le Quotidien du Médecin newspaper and on its website.
The Doctolib decision clearly demonstrates that merger control thresholds can no longer be considered an absolute "safe harbor." It has become clear that even small-scale, below-threshold acquisitions may pose a risk of competition law infringement, particularly for dominant undertakings.
Conclusion
The scrutiny of acquisitions that fall below the threshold but are of a strategic nature has become one of the priority issues for competition authorities. The approach taken by the German and French authorities in their decisions at the end of 2025, although exceptional, demonstrates that sub-threshold mergers and acquisitions cannot automatically be considered "risk-free." German competition law regulations, through GWB § 32f(2), provide for a targeted and ex-ante notification obligation for certain undertakings, while French regulations, in line with the Towercast case law, prefer an ex-post and general review process. Although the ex-ante review envisaged under GWB § 32f(2) offers greater predictability for undertakings, the ex-post approach of the French Competition Authority has created a significant legal certainty issue, particularly for undertakings in a dominant position. Both approaches demonstrate that competition authorities in Europe are closely focusing on below-threshold mergers and acquisitions and diversifying their review tools. In particular, it is evident that not exceeding turnover thresholds alone does not provide sufficient assurance for acquisitions carried out by undertakings in a dominant position.
- German Cartel Office (Bundeskartellamt), “Bundeskartellamt orders Rethmann Group to notify future mergers” (Press Release), 24 November 2025, https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Meldung/EN/Pressemitteilungen/2025/11_21_2025_Rethmann.html Accessed: 6 February 2026.
- German Cartel Office, Sector Inquiry into Municipal Waste – Final Report (Sektoruntersuchung Siedlungsabfälle – Abschlussbericht), 28 December 2023, https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Publikation/DE/Sektoruntersuchungen/Sektoruntersuchung_Siedlungsabfaelle.html?nn=48888 Accessed: 6 February 2026.
- French Competition Authority (Autorité de la concurrence), “The Autorité fines Doctolib €4,665,000 for abusing its dominant position in the online medical appointment booking market”, https://www.autoritedelaconcurrence.fr/en/press-release/autorite-fines-doctolib-eu4665000-abusing-its-dominant-position-online-medical Accessed: 6 February 2026.
All rights of this article are reserved. This article may not be used, reproduced, copied, published, distributed, or otherwise disseminated without quotation or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm's written consent. Any content created without citing the resource or Erdem & Erdem Law Firm’s written consent is regularly tracked, and legal action will be taken in case of violation.
Other Contents
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (“Court”) issued its memorandum opinion (Memorandum Opinion) on November 18, 2025, in the antitrust case (“Case”) between the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and Meta Platforms Inc. (“Meta”). The FTC alleges that Meta monopolized the market…
No-poach agreements, which have become one of the most prominent concepts in global competition law in recent years, are defined in the Glossary of Competition Terms as “agreements, whether direct or indirect, whereby one undertaking agrees not to make job offers to, or hire, the employees of another...
The Competition Board (“Board”) has broad powers to request information from undertakings. The legal basis for this authority is provided by Article 14 of Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”). Under this provision, the Board may request any information it deems necessary from public...
Competition authorities around the world have increasingly focused on labor market infringements under competition law, issuing new regulations and guidance recently. Notable examples include the U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission’s joint guidance, the Japanese Fair Trade Commission’s...
Chapter 8 of the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) sets out the legal remedies available to data subjects in the event of a breach of their rights under the GDPR. Accordingly, each data subject has a right to lodge a complaint with the supervisory authority of the Member State in which they reside, work...
Mergers and acquisitions play a critical role in shaping the competitive structure of the market. Although such transactions can lead to positive outcomes such as the provision of products and services at lower prices, the development of new products and technologies, and improvements in quality, they may also...
Technology and the opportunities it brings undoubtedly play a key role in strengthening the competitiveness of market players. In this context, pricing algorithms that enable undertakings to monitor publicly available prices and optimize their own pricing strategies have become widely used, especially by digital platforms...
The Regulation on Fines to Apply in Cases of Agreements, Concerted Practices and Decisions Restricting Competition, and Abuse of Dominant Position (“Former Regulation on Fines”), which entered into force upon its publication in the Official Gazette dated February 15, 2009 and numbered 27142, was...
In the past years, the Turkish Competition Board (“Board”) has closely monitored the activities of undertakings operating in the retail sector. As a result of the Board’s record of administrative fines, horizontal type of violations in the retail sector have been highly publicized. Vertical violations such as resale price...
In recent years, numerous automobile manufacturers have announced their goals to reduce carbon emissions, with many brands setting net-zero carbon targets spanning from production processes to the lifecycle of their vehicles. While ongoing debates persist regarding the significantly higher carbon footprint of...
Under Article 15 of Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”), the Competition Board (“Board”) may conduct on-site inspections at the undertakings’ premises when it deems necessary in fulfilling the duties assigned to it. During the on-site inspection, the Board is authorized to examine all...
Agreements and information exchanges between undertakings in labor markets have recently been examined in various preliminary investigations and investigations initiated by the Turkish Competition Authority (“Authority”). Following the investigations in which some undertakings were subject to...
The Turkish Competition Board’s (Board) decision regarding the acquisition of the international road transport business line of Ekol Lojistik AŞ (Ekol) by DFDS A/S (DFDS) has been one of the most prominent transactions on the competition law agenda recently...
The Competition Board (“Board”) has broad powers to request information from undertakings. The Board’s authority to request information arises from Article 14 of the Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”). Under the relevant provision, the Board may request any information it deems...
Doğuş Otomotiv Servis ve Ticaret A.Ş. (Doğuş) applied to the Turkish Competition Authority for an exemption for the practice of recommending basic wages to be applied to sales and after-sales service employees of its authorized dealers and distributors...
Access to Instagram was blocked ex officio by the Information and Communication Technologies Authority (ICTA) as of 2.08.2024. Under Article 8 of Law No. 5651 on the Regulation of Publications on the Internet and Combating Crimes Committed Through These Publications, ICTA can issue an ex officio access...
It is well known that agreements between employer undertakings with regards to their employees, such as wage-fixing and non-poaching agreements, along with competitively sensitive information exchanges have been under the scrutiny of competition authorities all over the world, including the Turkish Competition...
Automotive is one of the sectors in which the world’s most significant investments are made. The Competition Board (“Board”) has been closely interested in the automotive sector over the years and has conducted various examinations and studies in this field...
Competition authorities around the world continue unabated to investigate competition concerns arising from data collection and processing activities of digital platforms and impose severe sanctions as a result...
The startup ecosystem in Turkey has experienced notable growth in recent years. In the last quarter of 2023, 81 startups secured a combined investment of around 60 million dollars. While the number of investments remained consistent when comparing the third quarter periods of 2022-2023, there was a decrease...
Hub and Spoke cartel is a type of violation that is not clearly defined and regulated under Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”). Decisional practices of foreign competition authorities, particularly the UK Competition and Markets Authority’s decisions (“CMA”), are instructive concerning...
The Competition Board ("Board") made an addition to its line of decisions on resale price maintenance with its decision on Sunny Elektronik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş. ("Sunny") . In its decision, the Board thoroughly examined the allegations regarding Sunny's involvement in maintaining resale prices and restricting...
It is observed that the Competition Authority (“Authority”) has recently scrutinized various industries such as fast-moving consumer goods, labor market, pharmaceuticals, and cement. When the reasoned decisions of the Competition Board (“Board”) published in October are examined, it can be seen that the...
Jules Verne says, “Everything on earth has a limited lifespan, nothing that will exist forever can be created by human hands”. Perhaps change is the only constant concept in all our lives. Despite two major world wars and countless periods of crisis, humanity has been undergoing a great change and...
At the meeting of the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (“FIFA”) held on 16 December 2022, the FIFA Council approved the FIFA Football Agents Regulations (“FFAR”). In the FFAR, various amendments have been made, such as the introduction of a maximum service fee limit that football agents are...
Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) is still considered a hardcore restriction under the recently revised Vertical Block Exemption Regulation (VBER), which means that it cannot benefit from a statutory exemption under Article 101(1) TFEU, unlike certain other types of vertical agreements. However, it has been debated...
In competition law, it is important to accurately determine the concept of undertaking, especially in terms of mergers and acquisitions. Therefore, the concept of economic entity aims to reveal the economic units covered by the undertakings. The relationship between the concept of economic entity and family ties comes...
In these days when the Competition Board (“Board”) frequently imposes administrative fines for preventing on-site inspections and both the Competition Authority (“Authority”) and undertakings take legal and technical measures regarding on-site inspections, a striking development has occurred. In its decision...
Online advertising has become an important source for businesses for promoting products and services and meeting consumers, as a result of the rapid development of information technologies and increase in the use of internet. Delivering targeted messages to consumers at the right time through the digital...
Selective distribution systems refer to a type of distribution system in which suppliers commit to selling the contracted goods or services directly or indirectly to distributors selected based on specified criteria, while the distributors commit not to sell the said goods or services to unauthorized...
Fast-moving consumer goods is undoubtedly one of the sectors that the Competition Authority has been working most intensively since the COVID 19 pandemic. Among the most important developments of this period was the Sector Inquiry initiated on Fast Moving Consumer Goods (“FMCG”) Retailing...
In the decision of the Constitutional Court ("Constitutional Court" or "Court") dated 09.11.2022, numbered 2020/67 E. 2022/139 K. (the "Decision"), the annulment of certain articles of the Law Amending the Law on the Protection of Competition No. 4054 ("Law No. 7246") was requested...
In Turkish competition law, certain types of mergers and acquisitions are subject to Turkish Competition Board’s (“Board”) approval in order to gain legal validity. Pursuant to Article 7 of the Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”), the Board is competent to define mergers and acquisitions...
Recently, the Competition Board (the Board) had imposed administrative fines on banks and financial institutions for failing to respond to the request for information within the scope of a preliminary investigation.[i] The request for information that lays the groundwork for the administrative fine imposed by...
Amazon, a world-famous company, is an e-commerce company that operates the world’s largest online shopping platform. In the backstage, Amazon is a data-driven company whose retail decisions are mostly driven by automated systems, fueled by the relevant market data. That being said, Amazon has a dual...
The right to make on-site inspections is one of the Competition Board’s (“Board”) most important tools for revealing whether Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”) has been violated. The effective use of this authority is quite important in terms of obtaining fruitful results from...
“Harese” is an interesting Arabic word. There is a thorn that camels love very much in the desert. The camel eats the thorn with great greed. So much so that, its mouth bleeds as it eats, but it doesn't stop eating. The taste of the thorn is mixed with the salty taste of its own blood. This mixed taste drives the camel...
Turkey’s leading pay television service provider, Krea İçerik Hizmetleri ve Prodüksiyon A.Ş. (“Digiturk”), is frequently the subject of complaints made to the Competition Authority (“Authority”). In fact, the Competition Board (“Board”) issues a new decision about Digiturk almost every year. In these decisions...
The French Competition Authority (Autorité de la Concurrence), within the scope of the competition law proceeding initiated upon the complaint of Criteo SA (“Criteo”), accepted the commitments proposed by Meta Platforms Inc., Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd., and Facebook France...
While the scope of Competition Board’s (“Board”) power to conduct on-site inspections has increased with the introduction of Guidelines on Examination of Digital Data during On-site Inspections (“Guidelines”), nowadays the amount of monetary fines imposed on undertakings continue to...
The hub and spoke cartel, which is a relatively new type of violation in terms of Turkish competition law, is defined as the indirect exchange of information between two independent undertakings which are horizontal competitors on the supplier or retailer level, through another undertaking...
The settlement mechanism has only recently been introduced to Turkish competition law practice. It entered into force with the amendment made to the Law on the Protection of Competition (“Law”) numbered 4054 on 16.06.2020, and has been in effect for less than two years. In this relatively...
Due to their increasing share in the economy and rapid growth rate, e-marketplace platforms have come under the increasing scrutiny of the Turkish Competition Authority (“Authority”) as well as many competition authorities around the world...
Pursuant to the Amendment Communiqué Concerning the Mergers and Acquisitions Requiring the Competition Board’s Approval (“Amending Communiqué”) published in the Official Gazette dated March 4th, 2022 and numbered 31768, certain amendments have been introduced...
The Competition Board (“Board”) has recently published a reasoned decision in which it evaluated BSH Ev Aletleri Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş.’s (“BSH”) request for negative clearance or exemption with regard to its practice of prohibiting authorized dealers from making sales through online marketplaces...
Shahmaran, a Mesopotamian myth, is believed to take place in Tarsus. According to the myth, the shah of snakes is the immortal and omniscient "Shahmaran." Shahmaran is described as a beautiful woman living in her cave with her snakes...
During the COVID-19 pandemic, competitive concerns about the pricing behavior of chain markets, manufacturers, and wholesalers engaged in the retail trade of food and cleaning supplies led to an investigation by...
When the past decisions and the recent decisions of the Competition Board (“Board”) are examined, a significant increase can be observed in the number of decisions where the Board found hindrance or obstruction of on-site inspections. This situation shows that...
The European Commission began investigating the collusive behavior of Credit Suisse, UBS, Barclays, RBS, and HSBC in the Foreign Exchange (forex) spot trading market in 2019. With the recent press release dated 02.12.2021, the Commission announced that the case is now closed...
Digitalization, in particular, necessitates the rewriting of competition law rules. Competition law is at the center all questions regarding e-commerce and digital platforms. The aforementioned platforms, which have become prominent due to innovations in...